Results 1 to 3 of 3
02-24-14, 05:07 PM #1
Supreme Court declines to review case about whether the right to bear arms in public for self-defense extends to responsible, law-abiding 18- to 20-year-oldsThe Justices on Monday declined to review two cases brought by the National Rifle Association that deal with whether those age 18-20 can buy and then carry handguns in public for self-defense.The justices gave no reason for denying those cases and a third gun-control appeal on out-of-state weapon transfers.The decision not to intervene means the state and federal laws at issue will remain in effect, and are at least a temporary setback for gun-rights advocates.The NRA had hoped the court was prepared to address a broader, politically explosive issue-- whether there was a fundamental constitutional right to carry a concealed weapon in public.
02-24-14, 10:03 PM #2
That's disappointingHe who has the money, signs the cheques.
He who signs the cheques, makes the rules.
He who makes the rules, has the power.
He who has the power, has the money.
02-27-14, 03:23 PM #3
It isn't really, it wasn't a great case.I'm your huckleberry...
Quemadmoeum gladis nemeinum occidit, occidentus telum est!
You can be the weapon, and the gun in your hand is a tool - or the gun is a weapon and you are the tool.
I was looking for a saint who was a devil of a lover,
but every girl I found was either one way or the other...
Users Browsing this Thread
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)