Results 1 to 16 of 16
Thread: 'Shoot-To-Wound' Bill
-
03-01-06, 04:57 PM #1
'Shoot-To-Wound' Bill
Just when I think I have seen every stupid thing there is to see.....
New York Legislator Drops 'Shoot-To-Wound' Bill
A New York state legislator who is also a candidate for lieutenant governor has withdrawn a bill that would limit police use of deadly force.
Democratic state Sen. David Paterson told the Daily News that he changed his mind about his "shoot to wound" bill after discussing the issue with the head of the state Association of Chiefs of Police.
The proposal was inspired by the death of Amadou Diallo, an unarmed African immigrant who died in a hail of police gunfire. Diallo, challenged by officers who thought he resembled a suspected racist, was trying to pull out his wallet to show his identification. The four officers involved were acquitted of all charges.
"I wanted to try to ensure that such a tragedy would never happen again," Paterson told the News. "While that is still my goal, I realize on reflection that this bill was not the best way to pursue it."
-
03-01-06, 06:13 PM #2
Oh Geez!
K-9 When the door pops...The bullshit stops!
Go ahead run...I'll even give you a head start!
When the public needs help, they call the Police.
When the Police needs help, they call SWAT.
When SWAT needs help, they call K-9!
Duty not Reward
-
03-01-06, 06:18 PM #3
Better practice that aim - A pinkie is a hard thing to hit under stress
(\__/)
(='.'=) This is Bunny. Copy and paste Bunny into your
(")_(") signature to help him gain world domination.
-
03-01-06, 08:03 PM #4
That bill has since been withdrawn.
http://www.nydailynews.com/news/loc...8p-335252c.html
ALBANY - Under fire from all sides, state Sen. David Paterson has decided to withdraw his "shoot to wound" bill for cops, the Daily News has learned.
Paterson (D-Harlem), the running mate of gubernatorial hopeful Eliot Spitzer, had sponsored a bill that would have put extreme limits on when a cop could use deadly force - and criminally charge an officer if the use of such force was deemed unnecessary.
But Paterson was heavily criticized by numerous police groups after The News broke the news of the bill last week - and his stance even drew repudiation from Spitzer, the state attorney general.
Paterson said last night he decided to can the bill after he met with John Grebert, the executive director of the state Association of Chiefs of Police.
"I have always had the greatest respect for police officers and am grateful to Mr. Grebert for meeting with me to discuss how to achieve our mutual goal - helping police officers to safely protect and serve the people of New York State," Paterson said in a statement.
Police groups objected to the bill because it would require officers to use the "minimum" force against crime suspects who threaten them - and shoot to wound, when possible, rather than shoot to kill.
GOP gubernatorial candidate Bill Weld also took note of the legislation, blasting it as "a prescription for more dead cops."
Paterson wrote the bill in 2000, after an Albany jury acquitted four NYPD detectives in the Bronx shooting death of unarmed African immigrant Amadou Diallo.
"I wanted to try to ensure that such a tragedy would never happen again," Paterson said last night. "While that is still my goal, I realize on reflection that this bill was not the best way to pursue it."
-
03-02-06, 12:08 AM #5Until Ted Kennedy introduces it in the US Senate.
Originally Posted by 213th
Just kidding, but I wouldn't be shocked.
(\__/)
(='.'=) This is Bunny. Copy and paste Bunny into your
(")_(") signature to help him gain world domination.
-
03-02-06, 05:07 AM #6
Originally Posted by Stan Switek
"DUH"
No one has greater love than this, to lay down ones life for ones friends - John 15:13
"The Wicked Flee When No Man Pursueth: But The Righteous Are Bold As A Lion".
We lucky few, we band of brothers. For he who today sheds his blood with me shall be my brother.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~~~The opinions, beliefs, and ideas expressed in this post are mine, and mine alone. They are NOT the opinions, beliefs, ideas, or policies of my Agency, Police Chief, City Council, or any member of my department.
-
03-02-06, 10:28 AM #7
THE five-oh
Verified LEO- Join Date
- 12-03-05
- Location
- Somewhere in Florida
- Posts
- 1,869
- Rep Power
- 5544318
This is what happens when democrats try to think.
-
03-02-06, 03:00 PM #8
bad to the bone
- Join Date
- 12-09-05
- Posts
- 179
- Rep Power
- 3930462
Well, at least he did change his mind and admitted that he made a mistake.
-
03-02-06, 04:04 PM #9This doesn't make him sound like he changed his mind about anything except stra-tegery in how to obtain the same goal. Maybe he's gonna try to attack it thru police policy changes, citizen review boards, and lawsuits???:
Originally Posted by Daynathepayna
I seriously doubt he's gonna do the right thing and try to train citizens how to act when they're at gunpoint:"I wanted to try to ensure that such a tragedy would never happen again," Paterson said last night. "While that is still my goal, I realize on reflection that this bill was not the best way to pursue it."- Rule #1, hands outa the pockets!
- Rule #2, Shut The F up and get down!
It's pretty simpleLast edited by TXCharlie; 03-02-06 at 04:22 PM.
(\__/)
(='.'=) This is Bunny. Copy and paste Bunny into your
(")_(") signature to help him gain world domination.
-
03-02-06, 05:02 PM #10
At least he had the good sense to realise he didnt have a clue what he was talking about and admitted it. MOst would plow on and fuck everything royally up.
Im more concerned with this part:
wow man thats tough, suspected racist? What kinda crime is that?
Originally Posted by Stan Switek
Originally Posted by TXCharlie
-
03-02-06, 05:06 PM #11FishTail Guest
Snap...I spotted that but didn't care enough to post it. Racist...rapist perhaps?
-
03-02-06, 05:08 PM #12
THE five-oh
Verified LEO- Join Date
- 12-03-05
- Location
- Somewhere in Florida
- Posts
- 1,869
- Rep Power
- 5544318
Originally Posted by LongTail
I think it was rapist as well.
-
03-02-06, 05:41 PM #13It means he matched the description of a wanted suspect which is legal grounds for detention & further investigation.
Originally Posted by Garda30055A
-
03-02-06, 06:27 PM #14FishTail Guest
Yes...but how is being a racist a crime that he can be suspected of?
-
03-02-06, 07:06 PM #15
Spot on
Exactly, it mightnt be a nice character trait but thinking not-nice thoughts is hardly a crime. When did we get the ability to police thoughts and opinions?
Originally Posted by LongTail
Rapist does make sense OK but Stan didnt correct so I figure racist is correct.
Originally Posted by TXCharlie
-
03-02-06, 09:23 PM #16
i picked that up when i first read it too...
thats gotta be a mispost...its not illegal to be a racist. i believe its supposed to be rapist. i thought diallo was suspected to match the description of a guy that had committed some type of sexual assault.
maybe im wrong...
Thread Information
Users Browsing this Thread
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Similar Threads
-
Senate kills republican bill that would require all adult illegal immigrants to return home so they could later qualify for permanent status & return
By Terminator in forum In the NewsReplies: 0Last Post: 06-27-07, 02:24 PM -
Stupid bill amounts
By Tony in forum General TopicsReplies: 2Last Post: 06-24-07, 07:39 PM -
Expertise Improves Shoot-No Shoot Decisions In Police Officers And Lessens Potential
By Resident Smart Ass in forum In the NewsReplies: 0Last Post: 06-05-07, 09:31 AM -
House passes gasoline gouging bill
By BEK in forum In the NewsReplies: 3Last Post: 05-25-07, 03:20 AM -
War bill includes tempting projects
By Piggybank Cop in forum In the NewsReplies: 10Last Post: 03-21-07, 01:05 PM


LinkBack URL
About LinkBacks
Reply With Quote


Bookmarks