Welcome to the APBWeb.
Results 1 to 10 of 10
  1. #1
    countybear's Avatar
    countybear is offline BDRT - Baby Daddy Removal Team
    Verified LEO
    Super Moderator
    Join Date
    01-18-07
    Location
    Louisiana
    Posts
    6,512
    Rep Power
    4611614

    CB Rant: Garrido yet another system failure.

    CB Rant: Garrido was yet another system failure.

    Over the past week or so, we've all been stunned by the re-appearance of Jaycee Dugard. Kidnapped as a child, Jaycee turned up seemingly out of nowhere as an adult mother of two children, relating a harrowing tale of years of captivity at the hands of a known sex offender, Phillip Garrido.

    Of course, the first "WTF's" by the media were thrown at the police, especially when it was discovered that an officer had actually gone to the residence where Jaycee was being kept on a tip that Garrido was holding captive(s), and of course, the responding cop didn't sniff the air, paw the ground, and force his way into the compound like a one-man SWAT team to find and rescue Jaycee. To these who question why the cop was so timid, let me just say, "1983". If you miss my meaning, please turn in your ACLU membership card and I'll attempt to explain a bit.

    A "1983" action (42 USC 1983) is the delightful piece of federal legislation enacted in 1871, wherein a person can be found personally liable under a completely manufactured class of tort if it is determined that he or she violated a person's civil rights when acting "under color of law". Also referred to as the Ku Klux Klan act, it was hastily fashioned in response to a call from then President Ulysses S. Grant for Congress to provide a law to combat racially-based violence in the South during the reconstruction. It was reenacted under the Civil Rights Act, but broadened vastly in the U.S. Supreme Court case known as Monroe v. Pape (1961). Basically, this law, once applied to "persons", is now nearly exclusively applied to law enforcement officers in its modern applications, and wholly pierces immunities (there are no specifically qualified immunities provided), and since 1980 (Maine v. Thiboutot, USSC), even entitlement to welfare benefits is considered a 'civil right'. Since the right for persons to be secure in their homes is unquestionably one of the most basic rights enumerated under the Constitution, it is a given that professional cops (not the ones you watch on prime time television), are respectful of that right, even perhaps to a fault.

    All this is said in order to relate that kicking in a door and encroaching upon private property based upon an anonymous or otherwise uncorroborated tip could very well wind your everyday conscientious cop (and his superiors; see the definition of respondeat superior) in a lifetime poorhouse. If that were not enough, 18 USC 242 also says that his poor ass can be locked up for a civil rights violation when "acting under color of law" as well. Enough of the basic academy lecture, suffice it to say that although the department is dining on rare crow and is, I believe, sincerely apologetic for missing the opportunity to free Jaycee sooner, I can only imagine just how this individual cop must feel. We all feel that way when faced with circumstances where something we know is amiss, but remain shackled by the fear of being wrong, (and paying so dearly for it if we are).

    Let's look though at what I believe is the most serious miscarriage of justice in this entire surreal chain of events. When I heard the term "known sex offender" used to describe Garrido, I just had to ask myself, "how known?" The answer was revealed today: Garrido was convicted of the brutal kidnapping, rape, and hours-long torture of Katie Hall in 1977, but -- you guessed it -- he was paroled after serving 11 years on a 50-to-life hitch. Its easy to blame the cops for missing clues, but lets face it, whomever let this predator out on parole so that he could kidnap yet another victim; (this time a beautiful child named Jaycee, and just three years after his 1988 release), should be subject to the greatest scrutiny.

    I've jumped up and down on this soapbox enough to turn Gain into Tide, I realize, but for some reason we still just don't get it. Justice isn't "catch and release", it is "catch and keep", or I'm sorry to have to say in cases of particularly despicable and depraved conduct, "catch and kill". (Amnesty International readers, we now return to your next scheduled anti-capital punishment demonstration).

    Now, after we sit stunned to find out about Jaycee's 18-year ordeal, we are finally just dumbfounded enough to hear the cries of other victims, even from perhaps the bone fragments found by cadaver dogs in his back yard. Victims like Katie Hall, and Garrido's first wife Christine Murphy. Murphy called Garrido "a monster", claiming that when she attempted to flee him, he dug a safety pin into her face before throwing her into a car, and only once he was incarcerated for the rape of Katie Hall was she able to finally get away from him.

    Am I the only human being on Earth who thinks that Fifty-to-life should have meant more than eleven and a walk? I've said it before, and here again, we see how our system consistently fails us when our victims are considered insipidly by judicial beaurocrats. The cop who found Garrido in a makeshift porn palace holding Katie Hall after hours of torture and rape probably felt quite relieved when he heard "fifty-to-life" uttered from the lips of a well-intended judge, but I wonder if he was enough of a veteran to ponder and realize that such was just a ridiculous pipe dream, regardless of original intent. When Garrido walked, he walked with the blessing of an irrepairably broken legal system. With that same dubious blessing, Jaycee Dugard was to suffer 18 years of hell on Earth.

    Quoting a CNN story:
    Court documents show Garrido requested that his 50-year sentence be reduced to 25, making him eligible for parole in eight years, "where he could be released to the state of Nevada as an educated person and being a rehabilitated person."

    According to a 1978 court transcript, attorney Willard Van Hazel Jr. told a judge, "Without the influence of any of this drug involvement, I think Mr. Garrido would pause before carrying out sexual fantasies."
    Sometimes, you just have to let it out… pfft. (Remember kids, its not the person, but the drug that is the purveyor of criminal acts. Society itself is the true ill! So, if we legalize… whoops!, that’s a rant for another day…). To the liberal mind, even the criminal himself is but a hapless victim. Why was his sentence reduced from 50-to-life down to 25? Simple, he asked for it to be. (At least he asked nicely). Now through the magic wand of yet another beaurocrat, he's facing 25 years... well, no... if he's down to 25 now, that means he can get on the parole roles quicker. Its like a farce, isn't it? Bait and switch at its finest. "We said 25, but what we really mean now is that he can walk in... 11." (Somewhere there's a math professor whose totally given up on 'criminal justice' as a career choice).

    "... but he'll be supervised, right? I mean... he'll be registered as a sex offender, subject to the closest and most intense supervision that the government has to offer and tracked by spy satellites like Bin Laden?" Um, no, Virginia. We now save that kind of monitoring for veterans and conservative tea party attendees.

    What a cruel joke this entire ignorant debacle was, and all unfortunately at the expense of an eleven year old girl. You want this kind of ridiculous brand of irresponsibility to manage your access to healthcare too?

    "He served about 20 percent of his sentence, and it doesn't take a mathematician to figure out if he served only one-third of his sentence, Jaycee Dugard doesn't end up in the predicament that she's in," said Andy Kahan, a crime victims' advocate in Houston, Texas.
    Recent news articles tell us that California is in a financial bind, so thousands of convicts just have to be released because the State can't afford to feed them... remember? Was that also the case in 1988? I have to ask, what else is new?

    After all, didn’t California's (horribly over-burdened) parole officers make frequent home visits, meet in office with Garrido regularly over the course of 20 years, drug test him, and even fit him with a tracking device? Must it be evidenced in more than blood and tragedy before we finally realize that ankle bracelets, parole supervision, and feelgood catch-and-release doctrine are but exersizes in futility, devoid of decency, diligence, or consideration for the victims (past and potential)?

    So what do the feds have to say about this?

    "Shhh! Be vewy, vewy quiet… and blame the cop who missed an opportunity in 2006. "

    Kudos to the Berkeley campus cop, Ally Jacobs, and the UC-Berkeley special events manager, Lisa Campbell for finally blowing the lid off of this fiasco. Sometimes, attention to details and gut feelings lead us into shocking revelations far beyond what we could reasonably imagine. A job well done by both of these ladies!

    All this said, how about this for a "1983" action;
    Quote:
    Jaycee Dugard v. The State of California (et al), the State of Nevada (et al), and the Federal Criminal Justice system... for rampant, habitual, and wanton neglect of the safety and security of their respective citizenry, in that Phillip Garrido was effectively captured by competent police work in the commission of a despicable crime, was granted due process of law and was duly sentenced, but then was prematurely returned to society through such aforementioned neglect, free to again viciously destroy innocent lives. Garrido was complimented, aided, abetted, and supported by the worthlessness of government systems acting 'under color of law', but devoid of any shred of diligence, common sense, or common decency. Even when he violated that parole, he was allowed to remain free in society.
    Someone tell me why is it again I do this job? Nevermind, now I remember...

    /rant off

    A special thank you goes out to pgg, for catching and pointing out a lack of clarity in the original post, which allowed me to access a little more info and amend it.

    "The American Republic will endure until the day Congress discovers that it can bribe the public with the public's money."
    - Alexis de Tocqueville, Democracy in America

    Tell me not, Sweet, I am unkind,
    That from the nunnery
    Of thy chaste breast and quiet mind
    To war and arms I fly.
    - Lovelace

    The opinions expressed by this poster are wholly his own, and should never be construed to even remotely be in representation of his employer, its agencies or assigns. In fact, they probably fail to be in alignment with the opinions of any rational human being.

  2. #2
    Jenna's Avatar
    Jenna is offline sheep
    Premium Lifetime Member
    Join Date
    06-11-06
    Posts
    24,152
    Rep Power
    4764593
    Well said.

  3. #3
    pgg's Avatar
    pgg
    pgg is online now Damnit, I'm hungry again.
    Verified LEO
    Super Moderator
    Join Date
    06-16-08
    Location
    Fled the Emerald Triangle
    Posts
    10,944
    Rep Power
    3911013
    Now Jenna you just need to convince your friends to realize this.

    Its going to get alot worst. The federal courts have ordered California to release 40,000 prisoners. The state legistlators are trying to turn alot of our felonies into misdemeanors so that burden will now be on local governments to incarcerate people. Meanwhile the state is also raiding local budgets. Crime is going to go up here in California, more incidents like what happened with Jaycee are probably going to happen. LE is limited to a reactive role only. Both because of lack of manpower and the threat of lawsuits from ACLU and others like them.
    'Political Correctness is a doctrine fostered by a
    delusional, illogical liberal minority, and rabidly
    promoted by an unscrupulous mainstream media, which
    holds forth the proposition that it is entirely
    possible to pick up a turd by the clean end!'

    A fear of weapons is a sign of retarded sexual and emotional maturity. Sigmund Freud

  4. #4
    Xiphos's Avatar
    Xiphos is offline I Void Warranties
    Verified LEO
    Super Moderator
    Join Date
    03-09-08
    Location
    Thermopylae
    Posts
    8,336
    Rep Power
    7688650
    Excellent! This needs to be on the front page. K?

  5. #5
    countybear's Avatar
    countybear is offline BDRT - Baby Daddy Removal Team
    Verified LEO
    Super Moderator
    Join Date
    01-18-07
    Location
    Louisiana
    Posts
    6,512
    Rep Power
    4611614
    Quote Originally Posted by Xiphos View Post
    Excellent! This needs to be on the front page. K?
    Fine by me.

    "The American Republic will endure until the day Congress discovers that it can bribe the public with the public's money."
    - Alexis de Tocqueville, Democracy in America

    Tell me not, Sweet, I am unkind,
    That from the nunnery
    Of thy chaste breast and quiet mind
    To war and arms I fly.
    - Lovelace

    The opinions expressed by this poster are wholly his own, and should never be construed to even remotely be in representation of his employer, its agencies or assigns. In fact, they probably fail to be in alignment with the opinions of any rational human being.

  6. #6
    lewisipso's Avatar
    lewisipso is offline Injustice/Indifference/In God we trust
    Supporting Member Lvl 3
    Verified LEO
    Super Moderator
    Join Date
    02-02-07
    Location
    Louisiana
    Posts
    14,658
    Rep Power
    6822866
    "... but he'll be supervised, right? I mean... he'll be registered as a sex offender, subject to the closest and most intense supervision that the government has to offer and tracked by spy satellites like Bin Laden?"
    This is the very belief that fuels the fire of probation and parole early release. Between the favors called in and the perception that the overworked, underpaid, persons with little or no resources are able to pull a rabbit out of their asses is how these situations happen. The second the "budget crisis" term is dropped criminals are released. Hell between the "budget crisis" and the fire marshal I'm surprised that we have anyone in jail or prison.
    Do not war for peace. If you must war, war for justice. For without justice there is no peace. -me

    We are who we choose to be.

    R.I.P. Arielle. 08/20/2010-09/16/2012


  7. #7
    Xiphos's Avatar
    Xiphos is offline I Void Warranties
    Verified LEO
    Super Moderator
    Join Date
    03-09-08
    Location
    Thermopylae
    Posts
    8,336
    Rep Power
    7688650
    Quote Originally Posted by countybear View Post
    Fine by me.
    It's up, thanks!
    Pleasing nobody, one person at a time.

    That which does not kill me, better start fucking running.

    If I lived every day like it was my last, the body count would be staggering.

    I intend to go in harm's way. -John Paul Jones

    Hunt the wolf, and bring light to the dark places that others fear to go. LT COL Dave Grossman

  8. #8
    Wolven's Avatar
    Wolven is offline Major
    Verified LEO
    Join Date
    10-06-07
    Location
    Heaven on Earth
    Posts
    4,060
    Rep Power
    1322594
    Never be afraid to do what's right, especially if the well-being of a person or animal is at stake. Society's punishments are small compared to the wounds we inflict on our soul when we look the other way" ~Martin Luther King, Jr

  9. #9
    deputysykes's Avatar
    deputysykes is offline Corporal
    Verified LEO
    Join Date
    05-16-06
    Location
    Midwest US
    Posts
    934
    Rep Power
    295592
    Partly caused by the changing of 'punishment' into 'rehabilitation.'
    I'm not ruining your life, you are, and I'm just going to write a short story about it.

  10. #10
    mavriktu's Avatar
    mavriktu is offline Patrol Sgt.
    Verified LEO
    Join Date
    05-21-06
    Location
    Louisiana
    Posts
    2,847
    Rep Power
    5559833
    Of course, the first "WTF's" by the media were thrown at the police, especially when it was discovered that an officer had actually gone to the residence where Jaycee was being kept on a tip that Garrido was holding captive(s), and of course, the responding cop didn't sniff the air, paw the ground, and force his way into the compound like a one-man SWAT team to find and rescue Jaycee. To these who question why the cop was so timid, let me just say, "1983". If you miss my meaning, please turn in your ACLU membership card and I'll attempt to explain a bit

    From my understanding,and diagrams that I have seen,the above is definately true,BUT,what the cop saw when he went to the residence was something similar to this:
    .

    .
    .Sorry bout the large letters dont know what goin on,anyway the compound was behind a security fence and some trees according to the diagram I saw,OK,so take a look above ,suspicious????? better call my local p.d. and let Daps know ,cause that is my back yard ,taken about 5 minutes ago.If I am standing at your door,looking through your house front to rear and see this ,what is suspicious,if I go to the side yard and see this,what is suspicious??.Before you think I am in the woods,those trees end in 30' and it is a vacant lot for another 30' than a street.

 

 

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •