Welcome to the APBWeb.
Results 1 to 4 of 4
Like Tree2Likes
  • 1 Post By Pudge
  • 1 Post By SteelCityK9Cop

Thread: Supreme Court rejects plea to ban taping of police in Illinois

  1. #1
    Jenna's Avatar
    Jenna is offline sheep
    Premium Lifetime Member
    Join Date
    Rep Power

    Supreme Court rejects plea to ban taping of police in Illinois

    The U.S. Supreme Court on Monday declined to hear an appeal of a controversial Illinois law prohibiting people from recording police officers on the job.
    By passing on the issue, the justices left in place a federal appeals court ruling that found that the state's anti-eavesdropping law violates free-speech rights when used against people who audiotape police officers.
    Illinois' eavesdropping law is one of the harshest in the country, making audio recording of a law enforcement officer even while on duty and in public a felony punishable by up to 15 years in prison.
    Alvarez argued that allowing the recording of police would discourage civilians from speaking candidly to officers and could cause problems securing crime scenes or conducting sensitive investigations.
    But a federal appeals panel ruled that the law "restricts far more speech than necessary to protect legitimate privacy interests."
    Supreme Court rejects plea to ban taping of police in Illinois - chicagotribune.com

  2. #2
    Pudge's Avatar
    Pudge is online now Site Admin
    Verified LEO
    Super Moderator
    Join Date
    Rep Power
    At any given time during my day I'm recorded by my own body cam, dash cam, pocket recorder, MDC, Radio recorder, GPS, etc. One more recording device in the mix doesn't bother me barring a clear cut threat to my safety or that of others.

    We're performing our jobs as "public servants", prohibiting the public from recording us doing the jobs we are sworn to do for them (even the anti police) is ridiculous.
    MacLean likes this.
    "Like" us on facebook! https://www.facebook.com/pages/Offic...93147194083228

    Follow members of O/R as they tweet a "Ride a long" on their shifts on the front page of the site and on twitter at the following links:


    The opinions given in my posts & threads DO NOT reflect the opinions, views, policies, and/or procedures of my employing agency. They are my personal opinions only, thereby releasing my agency of any liability, or involvement in anything posted under the username "Pudge" on Officerresource.com

  3. #3
    SteelCityK9Cop's Avatar
    SteelCityK9Cop is offline Officer First Class
    Verified LEO
    Join Date
    Pittsburgh, Pa.
    Rep Power
    Personally..... if worry about being taped prevents officers from acting like ass hats and makes us more professional I'm all for it.

    Sent from my DROID RAZR using Tapatalk 2
    Pudge likes this.

  4. #4
    lewisipso's Avatar
    lewisipso is offline Injustice/Indifference/In God we trust
    Supporting Member Lvl 3
    Verified LEO
    Super Moderator
    Join Date
    Rep Power
    I don't know why this is still an issue. Cameras are not going away. As long as I don't have to wear one of those bouncy clip on watch me take a piss uniform cameras I could care less.
    Do not war for peace. If you must war, war for justice. For without justice there is no peace. -me

    We are who we choose to be.

    R.I.P. Arielle. 08/20/2010-09/16/2012



Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)


Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts