Israeli Military Chief: Iran's Nukes Can Be Destroyed
Halutz: Iran’s nukes can be destroyed
By HERB KEINON
The Jerusalem Post
JERUSALEM — IDF Chief of General Staff Lt.-Gen. Dan Halutz said last week that Iran’s nuclear program “can be destroyed.”
Halutz made the comments during a conference at Tel Aviv University, Army Radio reported.
Israeli officials and politicians have openly discussed the possibility of an attack on Iran, either alone or with other countries, aimed at crippling Iran’s nuclear development capabilities.
Meanwhile, Israel’s Foreign Ministry responded to Iran’s decision last week to resume nuclear fuel production research by issuing a statement saying “it is clear that this step calls for a grave and immediate international response – sending the issue to the [United Nations] Security Council.”
The statement said such a move would “send a clear message that the international community will not reconcile with Iran’s breaching its commitments.”
According to the Foreign Ministry, Iran – by announcing its decision last week to resume its nuclear research and development – has rejected the international community’s efforts to co-operate with it.
Iran’s decision to resume unspecified research into nuclear fuel production – excluding, for the time being, the enrichment of uranium – was announced by a top Iranian nuclear official on state television.
Mohammad Saeedi, deputy head of the Atomic Energy Organization of Iran, said Iran’s nuclear program had suffered significantly from having suspended its research over the past 21/2 years, and he said his organization could no longer keep its scientists from proceeding.
Saeedi did not say what kind of nuclear fuel research Iran was planning to resume, but he said it did not include uranium enrichment.
The announcement was certain to raise further concerns in the United States and among its European allies who believe Iran is moving toward production of nuclear weapons. Tehran says the program is for electricity generation.
In Vienna, the head of the International Atomic Energy Agency, Mohamed ElBaradei, said the agency knew of the decision and added it was important that Tehran “maintains its suspension of all enrichment-related activity” as a way of reducing international suspicions about its nuclear plans.
ElBaradei also called on Iran to “build confidence and enable the resumption of dialogue with all concerned parties.”
The Iranian mission to the IAEA told the agency that Iran “has decided to resume from 9 February 2006… [research and development] on the peaceful nuclear energy program which has been suspended,” ElBaradei told the IAEA’s 35 board member nations in a restricted document made available to Associated Press.
A European diplomat accredited to the agency said it was too early to evaluate the significance of Iran’s move and whether it would scuttle talks planned for later this months between Iran and France, Britain and Germany on behalf of the European Union.
The EU has previously said that any decision by Iran to resume work on its uranium enrichment program would be “the red line” that would mean an end to European attempts to negotiate differences with Iran over its nuclear program and would revive EU attempts to have Iran taken before the UN Security Council for violating the nuclear non-proliferation treaty.
But the diplomat, who demanded anonymity in exchange for discussing EU strategy, said the Europeans would want to have details of what precisely Iran wanted to do before making a decision on future talks.
The West has long opposed Iran’s enrichment of uranium because the process can produce fuel for atomic weapons, but Saeedi said the research now planned was not of that type.
“The research in this field will have little to do with the production of nuclear fuel,” Saeedi said, adding, as the ElBaradei document confirmed, that Iran planned to keep the IAEA informed.
“It has been decided that the International Atomic Energy Agency will be informed today about [our] research in the field of nuclear fuel. Research will resume in co-operation and co-ordination with the IAEA in the next few days,” Saeedi said.
Iran has come under heavy international pressure from the IAEA, the UN’s nuclear watchdog, as well as the West to abandon its program to produce fuel for its Russian-built nuclear reactor, which is due to come on stream this year, and for its future nuclear power plants.
Iran has vowed it will never give up its right under the Nuclear Non-proliferation Treaty to enrich uranium and produce nuclear fuel inside the country.
While refusing to renounce the enrichment of uranium, Iran suspended many aspects of its nuclear fuel program in 2003 as a gesture of goodwill during negotiations with the big three European powers, Britain, France and Germany.
The negotiations collapsed in August after Iran resumed uranium reprocessing activities, a step before enrichment, at its uranium conversion facility in Isfahan, in central Iran.
The two sides resumed dialogue last month, but talks have so far failed to resolve the dispute. Further talks are scheduled for later this month.
Iran’s decision to resume nuclear research coincided with the announcement by Iran’s foreign ministry spokesperson Hamid-Reza Asefi that Iran will reject the U.S.- and European-backed Russian nuclear proposal if the plan sought to move any Iranian enrichment program to Russia, its northern neighbour.
“The Russian proposal is ambiguous. We have to talk to the Russians to see what are the details,” Asefi told reporters. “If it means enrichment be carried out [only] in Russia, we have said it is not acceptable. But if it is a complementary plan, we will study it.”
Extremists within the increasingly hardline Iranian government have denounced the Russian proposal as a “dirty trick.”