Results 1 to 5 of 5
02-15-07, 08:18 PM #1
Ninth Circus Overruled, Yet Again
PERMANENT RESIDENT ALIEN CONVICTED OF “AIDING AND ABETTING” A THEFT COMMITTED A “THEFT OFFENSE,” AND THEREFORE COULD BE DEPORTED, U.S. SUPREME COURT RULES
A permanent resident alien convicted of aiding and abetting a theft committed a “theft offense,” and therefore could be deported, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled last month.
In this case, Luis Duenas-Alvarez, a permanent resident alien of the United
States, was convicted of violating a California law when he helped steal a car. After he was convicted, the federal government claimed that the conviction was for a generic theft offense, and began removal proceedings. A federal immigration judge, agreeing with the government that the California offense is a theft offense for which the term of imprisonment is at least one year, found Duenas-Alvarez removable. While the Board of Immigration Appeals affirmed, the Ninth Circuit overturned the decision on appeal. The Ninth Circuit held that “aiding and abetting” a theft is not itself a crime that falls within the generic definition of “theft.” The case was then appealed to the U.S. Supreme
In a unanimous opinion, the U.S. Supreme Court held that one who aids or abets a theft falls, like a principal, within the scope the generic definition of
“theft.” The high court explained that common law, at one time, divided
participants in a felony into four basic categories: (1) “first-degree
principals,” or those who actually committed the crime in question; (2)
“second-degree principals,” or aiders and abettors present at the scene of the crime; (3) “accessories before the fact,” or aiders and abettors who helped the principal before the basic criminal event took place; and (4) “accessories after the fact,” or those who helped the principals after the basic criminal event took place. During the 20th century, however, the distinctions among the first three categories were eliminated, the justices explained.
“Since criminal law now uniformly treats those who fall into the first three
categories alike, the generic sense in which the term theft is now used in the criminal codes of most States covers such ‘aiders and abettors’ as well as principals,” the Supreme Court stated. Thus, an individual who aids and abets before or during the crime is treated the same way under the law as the principals are treated.
Accordingly, the high court determined that Duenas-Alvarez committed a “theft offense” for which he could be removed from the United States under the Immigration and Nationality Act.
The case is Gonzales v. Duenas-Alvarez, Supreme Court of the United States, No.05-1629, January 17, 2007.Rick James hair was synthetic and smelled like weed and coochie.
BIG hates no one, but loves only a few. Franklin, Grant and yeah, Mom too.
02-15-07, 08:29 PM #2
Now if we could send the rest of the thugs somewhere else too, this would be a better place to live. The world needs a large island that noone lives on that all second or third strike felons could be sent to.
Hey how about Antartica, and the island could be governed by Liberals and Democrats!!!!!!! They could all reform each other and sing Kumbaya all day long."An Unarmed man can only flee from evil, and evil is not overcome by fleeing from it." Jeff Cooper
Some people are meant to be the police......Some people are meant to call the police!!!
"Socialism only works in two places: Heaven where they don't need it and hell where they already have it."
" I believe that forgiving them (Terrorist) is God's function. OUR job is to arrange the meeting."
General Norman Schwartzkopf
Not all Muslims are Terrorists, but all Terrorists are Muslim.
The statements posted by BigDawg DO NOT reflect the opinions, views, policies, or procedures of the author's employing agency. These statements are the personal opinions of BigDawg only, thereby releasing my agency of any liability, or involvement in anything posted under the user name of BigDawg. The opinions expressed by BigDawg are protected by the 1st Amendment of the U.S. Constitution. BigDawg’s messages are intended to invoke thought and discussion among the "Officer Resources" forum community and may not necessarily reflect the opinion of the author. BigDawg’s posts and any attachments are intended for an adult audience (18+) and may contain strong language, sexual content, nudity, violence, and may be graphic in nature. Some material may be considered offensive; reader discretion is advised. Please note that many of BigDawg’s posts are intended for entertainment value only. BigDawg’s posts are not intended to be used where prohibited by law. Furthermore, BigDawg's posts, and any attachments, may contain information covered by the Electronic Communications Privacy Act, 18 U.S.C. 2510-2521, and is confidential and proprietary in nature. If you are not the intended recipient, please be advised that you are legally prohibited from retaining, using, copying, distributing, or otherwise disclosing this information in any manner.
02-15-07, 09:31 PM #3Banned
- Join Date
- Rep Power
02-16-07, 09:35 AM #4
02-16-07, 11:04 AM #5
Bravo for the USSC in creating a valid statement on defining 'principals' to a crime. This could be extremely useful in the future.. I am taking notes.
"The American Republic will endure until the day Congress discovers that it can bribe the public with the public's money."
- Alexis de Tocqueville, Democracy in America
Tell me not, Sweet, I am unkind,
That from the nunnery
Of thy chaste breast and quiet mind
To war and arms I fly. - Lovelace
The opinions expressed by this poster are wholly his own, and should never be construed to even remotely be in representation of his employer, its agencies or assigns. In fact, they probably fail to be in alignment with the opinions of any rational human being.
Users Browsing this Thread
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
By Victor N TN in forum ShenanigansReplies: 1Last Post: 04-13-07, 11:53 AM