Welcome to the APBWeb.
Results 1 to 2 of 2
  1. #1
    chris2001's Avatar
    chris2001 is offline Captain
    Join Date
    12-03-05
    Location
    KS
    Posts
    2,690
    Rep Power
    680859

    Blackberry loses case

    Updated: 11:51 a.m. ET Jan. 23, 2006

    WASHINGTON - The Supreme Court on Monday refused to hear an appeal from the maker of the BlackBerry in the long-running battle over patents for the wildly popular, handheld wireless e-mail device.

    The high courtís refusal to hear Canada-based Research In Motion Ltd.ís appeal means that a trial judge in Richmond, Va., could impose an injunction against the company and block BlackBerry use among many of its owners in the United States.

    The justices had been asked to decide on whether U.S. patent law is technologically out of date in the age of the Internet and the global marketplace.
    Story continues below ↓ advertisement

    At issue was how U.S. law applies to technology that is used in a foreign country and allegedly infringes on the intellectual property rights of a patent-holder in the United States.

    The justices were asked to decide whether Research In Motion can be held liable for patent infringement when its main relay station for e-mail and data transmission is located in Waterloo, Ontario, outside U.S. borders.

    RIM was challenging a ruling by a federal appeals court that found that the company had infringed on the patents held by NTP Inc., a tiny northern Virginia patent-holding firm, because its customers use the BlackBerry inside U.S. borders. The panel said it did not matter where the relay station is located.

    Attorney Kevin Anderson, who represents NTP, said the firm is pleased with the courtís action. ďWe think the Supreme Courtís rejection of RIMís position makes it clear that RIM should stop defying the U.S. legal system,Ē he said.

    RIM sought to play down the significance of the courtís rejction. ďRIM has consistently acknowledged that Supreme Court review is granted in only a small percentage of cases and we were not banking on Supreme Court review,Ē said Mark Guibert, RIMís vice president for corporate marketing. ďRIMís legal arguments for the District Court remain strong and our software workaround designs remain a solid contingency.Ē
    Being the best is not what always counts. What counts is always trying your best.

    Remember who you are, and where you came from. That way you never get a big head.


    May those that lost their lives in 9-11 RIP, for the things you did not many could do. You left so many behind so that you could save so few. For now we stand strong as one, and will not look back till the fight is done. (me)

    http://www.danasoft.com/sig/Nowwhat%...5Csuphomey.jpg

    The opinions given in my posts DO NOT reflect the opinions, views, policies, and/or procedures of my employing agency. They are MY PERSONAL OPINIONS only.

  2. #2
    MountainCop Guest
    Wow - you mean that there's really a chance that I won't be able to get all my spam nationwide now????

 

 

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. Man charged in Phoenix serial case
    By Roses in forum In the News
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 12-15-07, 07:32 AM
  2. A little interesting case...
    By conalabu in forum In the News
    Replies: 14
    Last Post: 05-31-07, 07:00 PM
  3. Orleans DA drops murder case
    By dla4079 in forum In the News
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 02-19-07, 02:28 AM
  4. DA Nifong Wants Out of Duke "Rape" Case
    By Jackalope in forum In the News
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 01-12-07, 10:35 PM

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •