Welcome to the APBWeb.
Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 1 2 3
Results 41 to 42 of 42
  1. #41
    Billiardnut's Avatar
    Billiardnut is offline Attack Pug Dog Handler
    Join Date
    12-05-05
    Location
    Missouri
    Posts
    113
    Rep Power
    538174
    I think it is funny that defense attorneys are attacking the results of an instrument or an officer's observations for their client[s] being intoxicated.

    If the driver is impaired that should be the end of it. It doesnt matter if their BAC is .30% or .003% - every officer who removes an impaired driver off the road deserves a pat on the back.

    Personally I make my impaired driving case by the PC of my stop, simple observations and field sobriety tests. Breath results from an instrument is just icing on the cake.
    Last edited by Billiardnut; 03-12-06 at 06:11 PM.
    Member of the Pervert Patrol - making sure the pervs are tracked and up-to-date.
    National Sex Offender Public Registry
    www.nsopr.gov

  2. #42
    FishTail Guest
    Yeah...I'd just get the doctor in to examine them and declare them unfit to be driving. That plus my statement as to their driving and state of intoxication is usually enough. Oh, and I'd bill them the £150 to call out the doctor

 

 
Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 1 2 3

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. Vatican issues Ten Commandments for drivers
    By BEB in forum In the News
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 06-20-07, 01:09 AM
  2. IMUS creates more issues
    By SARG in forum Shenanigans
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 04-22-07, 11:25 PM
  3. I think this guy has some issues
    By Standard Dave in forum The Media Center
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: 04-04-07, 07:33 AM

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •