Welcome to the APBWeb.
Results 1 to 5 of 5

Thread: Crock of Sh*t

  1. #1
    bayern's Avatar
    bayern is online now Officer First Class
    Verified LEO
    Join Date
    04-19-06
    Location
    Dixie
    Posts
    1,771
    Rep Power
    1412072

    Crock of Sh*t

    Got this from a military related web site, Its dated June 22, 2009. Well, we lost another war with these feel good rules of engagement. Wonder who's fingerprints are all over this one. Lets see now; we want to arrest an armed subject for murder, but he runs into a house (while armed) with a family in it. So, we go away and try another day.


    KABUL - The top U.S. general in Afghanistan will soon formally order U.S. and NATO forces to break away from fights with militants hiding in Afghan houses so the battles do not kill civilians, a U.S. official said Monday.

    The order would be one of the strongest measures taken by a U.S. commander to protect Afghan civilians in battle. American commanders say such deaths hurt their mission because they turn average Afghans against the government and U.S. and NATO forces.
    Civilian casualties are a major source of friction between Afghan President Hamid Karzai and the U.S. The U.N. says U.S., NATO and Afghan forces killed 829 civilians in the Afghan war last year.

    Gen. Stanley McChrystal, who took command of international forces in Afghanistan this month, has said his measure of effectiveness will be the "number of Afghans shielded from violence," and not the number of militants killed.

    McChrystal will issue orders within days saying troops may attack insurgents hiding in Afghan houses if the U.S. or NATO forces are in imminent danger and must return fire, said U.S. military spokesman Rear Adm. Greg Smith.

    "But if there is a compound they're taking fire from and they can remove themselves from the area safely, without any undue danger to the forces, then that's the option they should take," Smith said. "Because in these compounds we know there are often civilians kept captive by the Taliban."

    McChrystal's predecessor, Gen. David McKiernan, issued rules last fall that told commanders to set conditions "to minimize the need to resort to deadly force."
    But McChrystal's orders will be more precise and have stronger language ordering forces to break off from battles, Smith said.

    In the most recent civilian deaths case, a May 4-5 battle between U.S. and Afghan forces and militants in western Farah province killed dozens of civilians. A U.S. report last week said U.S. forces killed an estimated 26 civilians. However, Karzai's government says 140 were killed, while an Afghan human rights group says the number is about 100.
    In the latest violence, a suicide bomber on a motorbike killed seven civilians Monday when he drove into the center of an eastern Afghan city and set off explosives
    .
    It was unclear who the bomber was targeting when he detonated a bomb on his motorbike in front of Khost city's electric power headquarters and then explosives on his body a few minutes later, said Kuchi Naseri, a spokesman for the governor of Khost province. The Interior Ministry said seven people were killed.

    There were no military or police nearby, Naseri said, but added the later blast may have been planned to hit police or officials rushing to the scene. Another 30 people in the area were wounded, he said.

    In southern Kandahar province, meanwhile, another suicide bomber killed three Afghan soldiers in an attack on a convoy of troops inspecting a highway bridge for explosives. The attacker drove a car into the convoy and it exploded, said Zadi district Police Chief Niaz Mohammad Serhadi.

    Serhadi said two civilians were also wounded in the blast, along with five other soldiers.
    In eastern Nangarhar province, an explosion at a weapons cache killed a 6-year-old boy and wounded 20 others, police said.

    It was unclear what sparked the chain reaction of explosions in caves used to store weapons and other material collected from insurgents on the outskirts of Jalalabad city, said Nangarhar province police spokesman Ghafor Khan.

    "We are still investigating the incident. It is possible that the explosives ignited on their own," Khan said.

    The caves where the weapons were stored were about 100 yards (meters) away from a village, and the blast shot some shells or other items into the residential area, Khan said. Two soldiers who guarded the cache were among the wounded.

  2. #2
    pgg's Avatar
    pgg
    pgg is online now Damnit, I'm hungry again.
    Verified LEO
    Super Moderator
    Join Date
    06-16-08
    Location
    Fled the Emerald Triangle
    Posts
    10,999
    Rep Power
    4046224
    War isn't pretty, I wish our administration would grow some balls and allow our military to do what needs to be done. This bowing down because we might "offend" someone is going to be our downfall

  3. #3
    CTR man's Avatar
    CTR man is offline Officer First Class
    Supporting Member Lvl 3
    Join Date
    05-20-06
    Location
    Ceres, CA
    Posts
    4,965
    Rep Power
    1169037
    Agreed. This Kumbaya that I keep hearing from our current administration is "offending" me.


    Choose The Right. When you're doing whats right, then you have nothing to worry about.

    Not a LEO

    In memory of Sgt. Howard K. Stevenson 1965 - 2005. Ceres Police Dept.
    In memory of Robert N. Panos 1955 - 2008 Ceres Police Dept.









  4. #4
    MacLean's Avatar
    MacLean is offline O/R Gun mod
    Verified LEO
    Super Moderator
    Join Date
    09-05-07
    Location
    Washington State
    Posts
    11,803
    Rep Power
    4604045
    Actually - I'm going to suggest you re-think this a bit.

    This is not a ground war, this is asymmetric warfare. Remember that we did in a few weeks what the Soviet Army could not do in ten years, and we did it with a tool we possess uniquely.

    Special Forces troopers were able to live with and work within the culture, turning out the Taliban at very minimal cost to US life.

    Combined with precision air power directed by USAF Special Operations units, there was no way they could stand.

    If we begin to perform like the Soviets, we will lose like the Soviets. This idea has more merit to it than you might suspect, and I do not think it came from the Obama Administration.

    (Google up General McC's background.)
    I'm your huckleberry...

    Quemadmoeum gladis nemeinum occidit, occidentus telum est!

    You can be the weapon, and the gun in your hand is a tool - or the gun is a weapon and you are the tool.


    I was looking for a saint who was a devil of a lover,
    but every girl I found was either one way or the other...



  5. #5
    213th's Avatar
    213th is offline Solipsist
    Join Date
    12-19-05
    Location
    64.3 N 149.1 W
    Posts
    3,672
    Rep Power
    1712096
    Quote Originally Posted by maclean View Post
    Actually - I'm going to suggest you re-think this a bit.

    This is not a ground war, this is asymmetric warfare. Remember that we did in a few weeks what the Soviet Army could not do in ten years, and we did it with a tool we possess uniquely.

    Special Forces troopers were able to live with and work within the culture, turning out the Taliban at very minimal cost to US life.

    Combined with precision air power directed by USAF Special Operations units, there was no way they could stand.

    If we begin to perform like the Soviets, we will lose like the Soviets. This idea has more merit to it than you might suspect, and I do not think it came from the Obama Administration.
    This is true. It may not sound like the 'right' thing to do in war, but it has been the policy (to varying degrees) in Iraq. The goal is not total domination of the entire country, but to rather allow the country(ies) to re-assume control with their own government, as an independant nation. Not as a conquered nation of the US
    He who has the money, signs the cheques.
    He who signs the cheques, makes the rules.
    He who makes the rules, has the power.
    He who has the power, has the money.

 

 

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •