View Poll Results: Should We Decriminalize the Possession of Small Amounts of Pot
- Voters
- 15. You may not vote on this poll
-
Yes
2 13.33% -
No
13 86.67%
Results 1 to 7 of 7
Thread: Pot Debate
-
07-22-09, 11:32 PM #1
Pot Debate
County might let pot smokers off easy :: CHICAGO SUN-TIMES :: Politics
In our county of Cook (I mean Crook) County the Sheriffs want to issue tickets for small amounts (10 grams or less) of cannabis possession. Here in Chicago we still arrest for any amount of "weed" but at the same time we have discretion. 99.99% of the time small amounts (10 grams or less ) of cannabis cases get thrown out in court, so it's a big waste of time. Give someone a ticket go to quasi court pay your fine everyone's happy So I kinda like the idea of tickets for possession of 10 grams or less. What do you think?" The hardest thing about disarming an armed suspect is not slipping on your own shit "
Michael P. Gordon E.O.W 08 Aug 2004

The opinions given in my posts DO NOT reflect the opinions, views, policies, and/or procedures of my employing agency. They are MY PERSONAL OPINIONS and I accept sole responsibility as such.
-
07-22-09, 11:55 PM #2
I had to vote no due to the way you worded the poll. I'm all for issuing citations for small amounts. At my agency we have to put anything we recover into the evidence lockers. That is at best a twenty minute drive for me one way. Add in the paper work associated with it and there is no time savings. Giving out non traffic citations is not decriminalizing marijuana. Also in my state after the first conviction of possession of marijuana if you are caught again it is a felony charge.
Meanwhile, fishing in Russia:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SkzV5AIK8iM
"When plunder becomes a way of life for a group of men living together in society, they create for themselves in the course of time a legal system that authorizes it and a moral code that justifies it." -- Frederic Bastiat
"Certainly there is no hunting like the hunting of man and those who have hunted armed men long enough and liked it, never really care for anything else thereafter." Ernest Hemingway
The opinions given in my signatures & threads DO NOT reflect the opinions, views, policies, and/or procedures of my employing agency. They are my personal opinions only, thereby releasing my agency of any liability, or involvement in anything posted under the username "Five-0" on Officerresource.com
-
07-23-09, 12:42 AM #3
Take a look see around my area and you'll see why its a bad idea
'Political Correctness is a doctrine fostered by a
delusional, illogical liberal minority, and rabidly
promoted by an unscrupulous mainstream media, which
holds forth the proposition that it is entirely
possible to pick up a turd by the clean end!'
“A fear of weapons is a sign of retarded sexual and emotional maturity.” Sigmund Freud
-
07-23-09, 08:17 PM #4
If it's under a certain amount and they qualify, we do an NTA (notice to appear) and do not arrest, but they have to make a court date and go see a judge. They will pay court costs and usually get community service. We still have to put in the property room, but we usually wait until we have an arrest and additional property before we take the ride. We can do a property entry in 5 minutes. It's 30+ to do a docket and take someone to jail. Longer if it's busy or a shift change at the sallyport. I'd rather spend my time on the street looking for the bad guys than running back and forth everytime I find a joint or two. We have way too much real violence going on to worry about some adult who wants to smoke a joint. The crack and meth and drunk drivers and shooters and really bad people need to take priority.
The six o'clock ruleI tell them to act according to the six o'clock rule, a phrase that causes most of them to say, "Huh?"
I tell them to use this little test before they decide to do something. If they were to do what they're thinking about, and it became the lead story on the six o'clock news, would they be proud? Would their department be proud, and would their family be proud? It's a simple way to live your life both personally and professionally.
Bruce Thomason
"If you tell the truth you don't have to remember anything." Mark Twain
-
07-23-09, 10:11 PM #5
I voted no, too... I think tickets need to be issued at a minimum, but there always needs to be the option of making the arrest in case you need to hold them while proving control of a larger amount or involvement in other crime.
Plus, if they're dickweeds, they should be inconvenienced at the very least.
(\__/)
(='.'=) This is Bunny. Copy and paste Bunny into your
(")_(") signature to help him gain world domination.
-
07-23-09, 10:42 PM #6
I'm voting no as well. Pot, in my opinion, should never be decriminalized even in small amounts. Once there is a limit set on what you guys can give a ticket for, there will always be someone who will want to raise that limit and keep raising it until voila. MJ in it's entirety is now decriminalized. I don't think we want that to happen.
Choose The Right. When you're doing whats right, then you have nothing to worry about.
Not a LEO
In memory of Sgt. Howard K. Stevenson 1965 - 2005. Ceres Police Dept.
In memory of Robert N. Panos 1955 - 2008 Ceres Police Dept.

-
07-23-09, 11:11 PM #7
Yep, it's like raising the speed limit to decriminalize speeders doing 70 - But then those people who were doing 70 will now do 80. Raise it to 80 and a certain percentage will then go 90 MPH. There is no end to it until they die.
(\__/)
(='.'=) This is Bunny. Copy and paste Bunny into your
(")_(") signature to help him gain world domination.
Thread Information
Users Browsing this Thread
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)


LinkBack URL
About LinkBacks
Reply With Quote


Bookmarks