Results 1 to 7 of 7
-
12-29-09, 08:03 PM #1
Debate over full-body scan machines at airports
More here: http://www.nytimes.com/2009/12/30/us/30privacy.htmlFull-body imaging machines are in use in 19 airports in the United States, and are being used as the primary method of screening at six. Earlier this year the Transportation Security Administration announced plans buy 150 more machines and to use the scanners as the primary screening method for air passengers.
That sparked a letter of protest from a coalition of 24 privacy organizations to Homeland Security Secretary Janet Napolitano, including the Electronic Privacy Information Center and the American Civil Liberties Union.
“Your agency will be capturing the naked photographs of millions of American air travelers suspected of no wrongdoing,” the letter said.
-
12-29-09, 08:54 PM #2
I would rather that than have someone frisk me. I would also rather that than get blown out of the sky while traveling by air because someone was afraid that their "Ghostly naked image" might wind up on the internet.
*************************"It wouldn't take much for me to up and run...to another life somewhere in the sun."
*************************"There's something inherently wrong with having to put on a bullet-proof vest and a gun to go to work."-(An old friend)
Any statements or opinions given in my postings or profile do not reflect the opinions, views, policies, and/or procedures of my employer or anyone else other than me. They are my personal opinions or statements only, thereby releasing my employer , any other entity, or any other person of any liability or involvement in anything posted under the username "Cidp24" on O/R.
-
12-29-09, 09:24 PM #3
So long as the images aren't kept longer than the flight safely landing, I'm fine with it.
I'm your huckleberry...
Quemadmoeum gladis nemeinum occidit, occidentus telum est!
You can be the weapon, and the gun in your hand is a tool - or the gun is a weapon and you are the tool.
I was looking for a saint who was a devil of a lover,
but every girl I found was either one way or the other...

-
12-30-09, 09:23 AM #4
Heard on the news that Al Quida in Yemen purchased two of the machines to train their guys on.
I just wish that this administration would just use common sense on the issue. Who are we looking for, little old white haired ladies or 14-32 year old muslims? Sure screen all passengers, triple screen the ones that are committing the acts of terror.
When your dept puts out a BOLO for a bank robber and give the description of a male, (race your choice) ages between 19-23 wearing jeans and a red t-shirt driving a blue Yugo, you don't stop old ladies in a caddy, do you? NO, you stop the guys in the blue Yugo. Every one; not every 5th one. Lets get off the PC band wagon and stop the terrorists, not the innocent.
-
12-30-09, 09:56 AM #5
If they do this, they should send the TSA screeners who will be viewing the images through the machines so they ensure they don't have a camera or cell phone with them when they go on duty.
The views expressed in the above post are the sole opinion of the author and do not reflect any official position by the author's employer and/or municipality.
-
12-30-09, 09:59 AM #6Swamp Mafia

The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is for good men to do nothing.
~Edmond Burke
Certainly there is no hunting like the hunting of man and those who have hunted armed men long enough and like it, never really care for anything else.
~Ernest Hemingway
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Follow me on twitter.........http://twitter.com/SecondChance122
Disclaimer: The opinions given in my signatures DO NOT reflect the opinions, views, policies, and/or procedures of my employing agency. They are MY PERSONAL OPINIONS and I accept sole responsibility as such.
-
12-30-09, 12:17 PM #7
Thread Information
Users Browsing this Thread
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)


LinkBack URL
About LinkBacks
Reply With Quote


Bookmarks