Welcome to the APBWeb.
Results 1 to 10 of 10
  1. #1
    StanSwitek's Avatar
    StanSwitek is offline Corporal
    Join Date
    12-04-05
    Location
    Huntington Beach, CA
    Posts
    891
    Rep Power
    1143359

    LAPD Sued - For A Good Reason

    Suit Targets LAPD Policy
    A group challenges the department's rule that prohibits officers from asking individuals about their immigration status, saying it is illegal.
    By Patrick McGreevy, Times Staff Writer
    May 2, 2006

    A nonprofit government watchdog group that lobbies for immigration reform filed a lawsuit Monday challenging the Los Angeles Police Department's policy of generally prohibiting officers from asking about the immigration status of individuals and limiting cooperation with federal immigration authorities.

    Judicial Watch, which is headquartered in Washington, filed the lawsuit in Los Angeles County Superior Court seeking to prevent the LAPD from enforcing Special Order 40, said Candice E. Jackson, an attorney for the group.

    ADVERTISEMENT
    "It violates the state and federal law by prohibiting the maximum amount of cooperation between the Police Department and immigration authorities in enforcing immigration laws," Jackson said.

    LAPD officials declined to comment on the lawsuit. "We do not make statements on litigation," Officer Jason Lee said.

    However, other city officials have long defended Special Order 40, which was adopted in 1979 by then-Police Chief Daryl F. Gates to encourage all people, regardless of their immigration status, to report crimes and cooperate with police.

    Without the order, council members said, some witnesses might be unwilling to come forward. Others have argued that without the policy, some victims might also suffer in silence rather than seek police protection.

    "If we repeal Special Order 40, it will lead to an increase in crime," Councilman Jose Huizar said. "People should feel comfortable, whether documented or not, to approach police officers and report a crime."

    The rule has been revised to allow officers to investigate when they have evidence that a criminal suspect has been deported and has illegally reentered the country, officials said.

    But critics of Special Order 40 cite the Costa Mesa Police and Orange County Sheriff's departments, which have begun developing plans for officers to train alongside federal agents so they can help enforce immigration laws.

    The lawsuit was filed on the same day hundreds of thousands of people demonstrated in Los Angeles to signal their opposition to proposals that would crack down on illegal immigration.

    The same group also sued the LAPD a month ago for failing to turn over documents showing how Special Order 40 is enforced and how officers are trained on the rule and disciplined when it is violated.

  2. #2
    Retdetsgt's Avatar
    Retdetsgt is offline How did I get here!
    Verified LEO
    Join Date
    12-07-05
    Location
    Oregon
    Posts
    1,944
    Rep Power
    7757735
    Good for them.

    We can ask, but can't do anything about it if they say they're illegal. The chief at the time, now the mayor is a sufferin' liberal who came out with an order prohibiting us from cooperating with the INS (yeah, I know, now ICE). We used to routinely put holds for immigration on top of criminal charges and dipshit stopped that.

    He's also the asswipe that as soon as he was elected mayor, pulled us out of the federal Home Security Taskforce.

    He's a constant embarrassment to the rank and file cops here.
    When I used to be somebody (I'm center top)

    "A burning desire for social justice is never a substitute for knowing what you're talking about". -Thomas Sowell-

  3. #3
    BEK's Avatar
    BEK
    BEK is offline Lieutenant
    Verified LEO
    Join Date
    01-02-06
    Location
    Minnesota
    Posts
    2,101
    Rep Power
    3397444
    Here we can ask, but it isnt like INS is gonna come get em. They wont pick up illegals unless there is 10 or more. It just may be the office that we deal with but I dont understand why they wont do their job.


  4. #4
    Terminator's Avatar
    Terminator is offline BANNED
    Join Date
    12-03-05
    Location
    None of your business
    Posts
    16,064
    Rep Power
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by BEK320
    Here we can ask, but it isnt like INS is gonna come get em. They wont pick up illegals unless there is 10 or more. It just may be the office that we deal with but I dont understand why they wont do their job.

    It's pretty much universal. A couple of years ago, at a previous department of mine, my Chief had rounded up about 20 illegal Mexicans in our town, detained them all (by himself), and called for ICE....he was promptly told that they would not come down unless he had a minimum of 25, because it wasn't worth it. So, he had to let them go.

  5. #5
    bayern's Avatar
    bayern is offline Officer First Class
    Verified LEO
    Join Date
    04-19-06
    Location
    Dixie
    Posts
    1,734
    Rep Power
    1328280
    Why didn't he hold on to them and go get 5 more? Not like there had to find.

    Quote Originally Posted by LawEnforcementForums
    It's pretty much universal. A couple of years ago, at a previous department of mine, my Chief had rounded up about 20 illegal Mexicans in our town, detained them all (by himself), and called for ICE....he was promptly told that they would not come down unless he had a minimum of 25, because it wasn't worth it. So, he had to let them go.

  6. #6
    bayern's Avatar
    bayern is offline Officer First Class
    Verified LEO
    Join Date
    04-19-06
    Location
    Dixie
    Posts
    1,734
    Rep Power
    1328280
    Whoops, didn't check the spelling "hard" to find.

    Quote Originally Posted by LawEnforcementForums
    It's pretty much universal. A couple of years ago, at a previous department of mine, my Chief had rounded up about 20 illegal Mexicans in our town, detained them all (by himself), and called for ICE....he was promptly told that they would not come down unless he had a minimum of 25, because it wasn't worth it. So, he had to let them go.

  7. #7
    Wise_undergrad_08's Avatar
    Wise_undergrad_08 is offline Master Officer
    Join Date
    12-31-05
    Location
    SW Virginia
    Posts
    262
    Rep Power
    284150
    Well, if they are illegal immigrants that suggests that a law has been broken in regards to them even being here. How can you then make a rule directly contradicting the that law by ordering it not to be enforced? That would automatically make the LAPD's stance on their "don't ask" rule invalid. You can't give unlawful orders. That seems ot be exactly what this is. Maybe I'm mistaken, but that's the logic I'm using on this one.

    How about that? For once, a lawsuit actually makes sense and isn't just frivolous. I hope they win or LAPD command backs down. Either or.
    "A nation, as a society, forms a moral person, and every member of it is personally responsible for his society."

    -Thomas Jefferson, 1792


    Cotton candy don't get wet until it's in your mouth.

  8. #8
    FishTail Guest
    Shame. I lock em up and then deport them. Benefits of living on a small island.

  9. #9
    Lo523's Avatar
    Lo523 is offline Master Officer
    Supporting Member Lvl 1
    Join Date
    04-16-06
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    1,353
    Rep Power
    2919829
    We work closely with Immigration - I've had 4 deported recently.

  10. #10
    121Traffic's Avatar
    121Traffic is offline Just Us
    Verified LEO
    Site Moderator
    Join Date
    01-09-06
    Location
    Colorado
    Posts
    4,547
    Rep Power
    6332979
    Quote Originally Posted by Wise_undergrad_08
    Well, if they are illegal immigrants that suggests that a law has been broken in regards to them even being here. How can you then make a rule directly contradicting the that law by ordering it not to be enforced? That would automatically make the LAPD's stance on their "don't ask" rule invalid. You can't give unlawful orders. That seems ot be exactly what this is. Maybe I'm mistaken, but that's the logic I'm using on this one.

    How about that? For once, a lawsuit actually makes sense and isn't just frivolous. I hope they win or LAPD command backs down. Either or.
    Because illegal immigrants are in violation of a Federal law, which local cops to a large extent have no authority to enforce. Just like in cities that allow personal amounts of MJ (i.e. Denver), it is still against Federal law but the cops can't go and charge them with violation of United States Code.
    "If anything worthwhile comes of this tragedy, it should be the realization by every citizen that often the only thing that stands between them and losing everything they hold dear... is the man wearing a badge." -- Ronald Reagan, in the wake of the deaths of 4 CHP troopers in the Newhall Incident, 1970

    The opinions given in my posts DO NOT reflect the opinions, views, policies, and/or procedures of my employing agency. They are my personal opinions only, thereby releasing my agency of any liability, or involvement in anything posted under the username "121Traffic" on O/R.

 

 

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. Experiment to Pay NYC Poor for Good Behavior
    By Buttercup in forum In the News
    Replies: 15
    Last Post: 06-19-07, 12:46 PM
  2. 10 reasons why good sex makes you healthier
    By Terminator in forum In the News
    Replies: 22
    Last Post: 05-30-07, 08:32 PM
  3. Many police officers fear being sued more than being murdered
    By Resident Smart Ass in forum In the News
    Replies: 13
    Last Post: 11-25-06, 06:58 PM

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •