Welcome to the APBWeb.
Results 1 to 4 of 4
  1. #1
    Operator13's Avatar
    Operator13 is offline Just Another Voice
    Join Date
    04-12-06
    Posts
    280
    Rep Power
    1851337

    Anonymity of Air Marshalls at risk

    Report: Anonymity of Air Marshals at Risk
    By: FREDERIC J. FROMMER (Sat, May/20/2006)


    WASHINGTON - More needs to be done to ensure the anonymity of federal air marshals, says a critical new report Congress will look into next week.

    The draft report, "Plane Clothes: Lack of Anonymity at the Federal Air Marshal Service Compromises Aviation and National Security," cites the service's dress code, which is supposed to prevent marshals from drawing attention to themselves.

    In practice, the report found, "many federal air marshals indicate that the dress code actually draws more attention to the identity of the federal air marshals because of its rigid requirements that prevent federal air marshals from actually blending in with their surroundings."

    The report by the House Judiciary Committee, a copy of which was provided to The Associated Press on Friday night, identified several policies by the service that the report concluded undercut the goal of preserving the marshals' anonymity.

    The report also faults the service for requiring marshals to stay at designated hotels and show their credentials upon checking in. It said that in one instance, the Sheraton Fort Lauderdale Airport Hotel in Florida designated the service "company of the month" because of the number of rooms it had reserved at the hotel.

    "This public designation essentially advertises for any terrorist wishing to attack a location populated by a concentration of federal air marshals that such a target is the Sheraton Fort Lauderdale Airport," the report says, referring to the hotel.

    And the report raised questions about boarding procedures by marshals, expressing concern that these procedures could give away the identity of the marshals.

    The committee, which initiated its investigation into the service in May 2004, said its staff interviewed 30 federal air marshals across the country.

    "An overwhelming majority of the interviewed air marshals stated that most concerns centered around threats created by the service's own policies to preserving anonymity and safety," the report says.

    The report also found the service's policy banning marshals from criticizing the service too broad, expressing concern that it was being used "as a retaliatory mechanism against those who vocalize legitimate concerns" about the service's policies.

    Dave Adams, a spokesman for the service, said he had not seen the report. But he did say that the service "fully cooperated and addressed" concerns and inquiries made by the committee chairman, Wisconsin Republican Jim Sensenbrenner.

    Adams said that the service provided a 29-page formal response, as well as a follow-up briefing in November 2004. The service has not been contacted by the committee on any substantive issue since then, he said.

    "Anonymity of the air marshals in our No. 1 concern," Adams said. "But the boarding of air marshals is set by federal regulations, which Congress sets."

    The committee is expected to vote on the draft report next week.

    ABC News first reported on the committee's findings Friday.


    --------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Article's URL:

    http://www.phillyburbs.com/pb-dyn/ne...06-659048.html
    "The statements and opinions contained in this communication do not necessarily reflect the official position of the Commission regarding these issues."

  2. #2
    Piggybank Cop's Avatar
    Piggybank Cop is offline Nobody important.
    Join Date
    05-17-06
    Location
    Richmond VA
    Posts
    2,207
    Rep Power
    645058
    "Anonymity of the air marshals in our No. 1 concern," Adams said.



    But we are bureaucrats, so we really don’t care, our asses aren’t on the line and besides if we didn’t make all these stupid rules we wouldn’t be able to show that we’re “working”.




    We are the thin blue line
    between you
    and all the money in the world.

    And no you can't have any.

  3. #3
    StanSwitek's Avatar
    StanSwitek is offline Corporal
    Join Date
    12-04-05
    Location
    Huntington Beach, CA
    Posts
    891
    Rep Power
    1143373
    This program has been screwed up from day one. Several people left my department for one of these positions. They all want to come back now. TSA is no better. Last time I flew, they left my bag unlocked & unzipped 12" with my 45 in the bag. Notified TSA who promply swept it under the rug. We are destined for another disaster. The only question is when.

  4. #4
    Crimebytes2's Avatar
    Crimebytes2 is offline Banned
    Join Date
    04-14-06
    Location
    Council Bluffs, Iowa
    Posts
    2,005
    Rep Power
    0

    Unhappy

    Quote Originally Posted by StanSwitek
    This program has been screwed up from day one. Several people left my department for one of these positions. They all want to come back now. TSA is no better. Last time I flew, they left my bag unlocked & unzipped 12" with my 45 in the bag. Notified TSA who promply swept it under the rug.
    Did you think TSA would accept responsibility much less admit their irresponsibility? Did you expect anything less?

    Quote Originally Posted by StanSwitek
    We are destined for another disaster. The only question is when.
    So true, and yet, so sad!

 

 

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •