Results 1 to 9 of 9
Thread: This Made Me HOT
08-23-06, 06:58 AM #1
This Made Me HOTCouple arrested for child endangerment
By MARK J. MILLER, Staff writer
TORONTO — A city man and woman were arrested Aug. 5 by City Police and charged with child endangerment in connection with a drunk driving charge.
Michael D. Ellis, 37, 808 Daniels St., Toronto, was charged with driving with no license, fictitious registration, driving a motor vehicle under the influence and two counts of child endangerment after being arrested by police, according to reports.
Christina Fluharty, 28, 808 Daniels St., Toronto, was charged with permitting an unlicensed driver to drive and two counts of child endangerment, stated police reports.
Patrolman Tony Porreca said he observed Ellis driving in a vehicle at 11 p.m. on Franklin Street Extension with Fluharty and two children, ages 2 and 3, in the back seat. Porreca said he pulled Ellis over “because he’s known by officers not to have a driver’s license.”
Ellis was taken to the police station and tested for alcohol consumption, Porreca said.
“He (registered) a .224,” said Porreca of the alleged incident. “That’s almost three times the legal limit.
“His girlfriend (Fluharty) was in the car,” Porreca continued, adding she was sitting in the passenger’s seat. “She had a license, and she was sober.”
Both were then charged, after which officers called Jefferson County Children’s Services, which dispatched a representative to interview the mother.
Ellis was taken to the Jefferson County Jail, said Porreca.
08-23-06, 08:31 AM #2
There should be a law against people like that being able to reproduce!!"An Unarmed man can only flee from evil, and evil is not overcome by fleeing from it." Jeff Cooper
Some people are meant to be the police......Some people are meant to call the police!!!
"Socialism only works in two places: Heaven where they don't need it and hell where they already have it."
" I believe that forgiving them (Terrorist) is God's function. OUR job is to arrange the meeting."
General Norman Schwartzkopf
Not all Muslims are Terrorists, but all Terrorists are Muslim.
The statements posted by BigDawg DO NOT reflect the opinions, views, policies, or procedures of the author's employing agency. These statements are the personal opinions of BigDawg only, thereby releasing my agency of any liability, or involvement in anything posted under the user name of BigDawg. The opinions expressed by BigDawg are protected by the 1st Amendment of the U.S. Constitution. BigDawg’s messages are intended to invoke thought and discussion among the "Officer Resources" forum community and may not necessarily reflect the opinion of the author. BigDawg’s posts and any attachments are intended for an adult audience (18+) and may contain strong language, sexual content, nudity, violence, and may be graphic in nature. Some material may be considered offensive; reader discretion is advised. Please note that many of BigDawg’s posts are intended for entertainment value only. BigDawg’s posts are not intended to be used where prohibited by law. Furthermore, BigDawg's posts, and any attachments, may contain information covered by the Electronic Communications Privacy Act, 18 U.S.C. 2510-2521, and is confidential and proprietary in nature. If you are not the intended recipient, please be advised that you are legally prohibited from retaining, using, copying, distributing, or otherwise disclosing this information in any manner.
08-23-06, 09:02 AM #3GrasshopperVerified LEO
- Join Date
- Rep Power
Nice job, Reca. Is the child endangerment on the part of the mother going to stick?And Shepards we shall be,
for thee, My Lord, for thee,
Power hath descended forth from Thy hand,
That our feet may swiftly carry out Thy Command.
So we shall flow a river forth to Thee
And teeming with souls will it ever be.
In Nomine Patris, Et Filli, Et Spiritus Sancti.
08-23-06, 09:54 AM #4CopsRCool302 Guest
Good Job Reca Bro!
08-23-06, 01:09 PM #5Originally Posted by conalabu
I believe it will under this section
No person , who is the parent, guardian, custodian, person having custody or control, or person in loco parentis of a child under eighteen years of age or mentally or physically handicapped child under 21 years of age, shall create a substantial risk to the health or safety of the child by violating duty of car portection or support.
The Mother was in the car, Had a valid license, was sober, and knowingly placed the children in the car with the father who was intoxicated. So I will say yes it will stick! If not it is her penny to hire a lawyer.
I also have child services involved in the case!
08-23-06, 01:35 PM #6
Good job!! I want to know who keeps putting all that friggin chlorine in the gene pool!!
Sad part is, county services will probably give the children back soon. When they think she has learned her lesson.
08-23-06, 01:47 PM #7Originally Posted by Growler
NO the sad part is the kids were never removed from the mother. LIBERALS!
08-23-06, 01:52 PM #8
WTF!!!??? My goodness, what will it take? A nuclear friggin explosion.
08-23-06, 01:59 PM #9
Maybe but even after that if they complete the "program" they will get the kids back.
A few years ago i had a case where parents left the 3 kids home alone ages 4 2 and newborn while they went and sold a tv for crack. call child services 6 mths later they had the kids back!
Users Browsing this Thread
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
By Cheech in forum The GymnasiumReplies: 20Last Post: 07-16-07, 06:04 PM
By Terminator in forum In the NewsReplies: 7Last Post: 05-31-07, 03:52 AM
By phantasm in forum In the NewsReplies: 4Last Post: 03-28-07, 09:45 PM
By Retmilleo909 in forum General TopicsReplies: 1Last Post: 03-26-07, 09:06 AM
By GOOSE in forum General TopicsReplies: 21Last Post: 03-09-07, 11:20 PM