Results 1 to 11 of 11
09-01-06, 06:12 PM #1
Ohio passes very interesting sex offender law for those never charged with a crime
COLUMBUS - An Ohio legislative panel yesterday rubber-stamped an unprecedented process that would allow sex offenders to be publicly identified and tracked even if they've never been charged with a crime.
No one in attendance voiced opposition to rules submitted by Attorney General Jim Petro's office to the Joint Committee on Agency Rule Review, consisting of members of the Ohio House and Senate.
The committee's decision not to interfere with the rules puts Ohio in a position to become the first state to test a "civil registry."
The concept was offered by Roman Catholic bishops as an alternative to opening a one-time window for the filing of civil lawsuits alleging child sexual abuse that occurred as long as 35 years ago.
A recently enacted law allows county prosecutors, the state attorney general, or, as a last resort, alleged victims to ask judges to civilly declare someone to be a sex offender even when there has been no criminal verdict or successful lawsuit.
The rules spell out how the untried process would work. It would largely treat a person placed on the civil registry the same way a convicted sex offender is treated under Ohio's so-called Megan's Law.
The person's name, address, and photograph would be placed on a new Internet database and the person would be subjected to the same registration and community notification requirements and restrictions on where he could live.
A civilly declared offender, however, could petition the court to have the person's name removed from the new list after six years if there have been no new problems and the judge believes the person is unlikely to abuse again.
The attorney general's office said it continues to hold discussions with a group representing day care operators about one of the rules pertaining to what such facilities would do with information they might receive pertaining to someone on the registry if that person is living nearby.
09-01-06, 06:16 PM #2
Let the vigilantes start stocking up on ammo.
09-01-06, 06:35 PM #3
It should give trial lawyers a lot of business filing libel suits against the State.
Last edited by TXCharlie; 09-01-06 at 06:40 PM.
(='.'=) This is Bunny. Copy and paste Bunny into your
(")_(") signature to help him gain world domination.
09-01-06, 11:56 PM #4
Guilty until someone with no evidence decides they might be safe?
Dangerous precedent, IMHO..."My motivation is slipping, people bug me, and I'm tired of wasting my time on drivel."
- Rep. Otis Pike (D - NY)
09-02-06, 12:27 AM #5
Yeah, I don't like that at all.
I've always said that the citizens of this country will hand over our freedom to the government in the name of the children.The virtue of spirit has no need for thanks or approval. Only the certain conviction that what has been done is right. -Jor El, as played by Marlon Brando
09-02-06, 11:19 AM #6
I'm all for fucking up dirtbags, but this doesn't seem right.
When you find yourself in a hole............QUIT DIGGING!!!!!!!!!
OK guys time to come clean. I am not only a police officer but I am also a big time movie star. I am using my real photo as my avatar now. Please NO autographs!!!!
The opinions given in my posts DO NOT reflect the opinions, views, policies, and/or procedures of my employing agency. They are MY PERSONAL OPINIONS and I accept sole responsibility as such
09-02-06, 11:45 AM #7
I just don't see how they can do that. I expect that Ohio's Supreme court will knock that law down the first time it's challenged."An Unarmed man can only flee from evil, and evil is not overcome by fleeing from it." Jeff Cooper
Some people are meant to be the police......Some people are meant to call the police!!!
"Socialism only works in two places: Heaven where they don't need it and hell where they already have it."
" I believe that forgiving them (Terrorist) is God's function. OUR job is to arrange the meeting."
General Norman Schwartzkopf
Not all Muslims are Terrorists, but all Terrorists are Muslim.
The statements posted by BigDawg DO NOT reflect the opinions, views, policies, or procedures of the author's employing agency. These statements are the personal opinions of BigDawg only, thereby releasing my agency of any liability, or involvement in anything posted under the user name of BigDawg. The opinions expressed by BigDawg are protected by the 1st Amendment of the U.S. Constitution. BigDawg’s messages are intended to invoke thought and discussion among the "Officer Resources" forum community and may not necessarily reflect the opinion of the author. BigDawg’s posts and any attachments are intended for an adult audience (18+) and may contain strong language, sexual content, nudity, violence, and may be graphic in nature. Some material may be considered offensive; reader discretion is advised. Please note that many of BigDawg’s posts are intended for entertainment value only. BigDawg’s posts are not intended to be used where prohibited by law. Furthermore, BigDawg's posts, and any attachments, may contain information covered by the Electronic Communications Privacy Act, 18 U.S.C. 2510-2521, and is confidential and proprietary in nature. If you are not the intended recipient, please be advised that you are legally prohibited from retaining, using, copying, distributing, or otherwise disclosing this information in any manner.
09-02-06, 12:35 PM #8
So you piss off the ex and they go tell a judge that you commited sex crimes..You have nothing to say for six years???? This doesn't seem like a logical way of dealing with the issue. But then if a lawmaker takes a stand against it they'll be made to look like they support sex offenders. I think it's jacked.I may have many faults, but being wrong ain't one of them.
09-02-06, 01:36 PM #9
I vote no.Molly Weasley makes Chuck Norris eat his vegetables.
Do not puff, shade, skew, tailor, firm up, stretch, massage,
or otherwise distort statements of fact.FBI Special Agent Coleen Rowley
09-03-06, 10:59 AM #10
So someone makes an allegation and the suspect if found not guilty or no case to answer but they are still registered as a sex offender and their details passed to every nut job and vigilanty in the state.
Again WTF that just sounds wrong.
09-03-06, 01:25 PM #11
I'm not surprised. We've been doing things backwards since the beginning of time.
Users Browsing this Thread
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
By BEB in forum In the NewsReplies: 2Last Post: 04-10-07, 10:31 AM