Results 1 to 3 of 3
10-10-12, 10:28 PM #1
Court Blocks S.C. Voter ID Law for 2012, But Clears It For the Future
A federal court in Washington today blocked South Carolina’s Voter ID law from going into effect for the 2012 elections, but said it could go into effect for future elections.
Under Section 5 of the Voting Rights Act, South Carolina — because it has a history of discrimination — had to get approval for the law from federal officials in Washington DC.
A three judge panel of federal judges unanimously said today that it couldn’t pre-clear the law “given the short time left before the 2012 elections,” but said that the law was not enacted for a “discriminatory purpose” and could go into effect “beginning with any elections in 2013.”
South Carolina Attorney General Alan Wilson said the ruling is a “major victory” for South Carolina. “It affirms our voter ID law is valid and constitutional under the Voting Rights Act,” Wilson said. He said that the law does not discriminate and he would “work diligently to implement this law for all future elections.”
Nancy Abudu, a senior staff attorney with the ACLU Voting Rights Project that had challenged the law, issued a statement saying, “We’re glad that thousands of voters who faced being denied access to the polls will get to vote next month, but are concerned about what lies ahead. This is a law that remains harmful regardless of when it is implemented.”
The law requires South Carolinians who vote in person to present one of five forms of photo ID. But Judge Brett M. Kavanaugh, writing for the court , emphasized that the law still permits citizens to use their non-photo voter registration card. The law he said, “provides that if a voter has a reasonable impediment that prevents the elector from obtaining photographic identification, the voter may complete an affidavit at the polling place attesting to his or her identity.”
Kavanaugh wrote that the “reasonable impediment provision” will make it “far easier than some might have expected or feared for South Carolina voters with a non-photo registration card…to vote as they could under pre-existing law.”
(and every individual without an ID needs to be verified as citizens with a photo taken on scene to go along with an affidavit claiming one as a citizen. If I have to show an ID and it hasn't killed me...)
Court Blocks S.C. Voter ID Law for 2012, But Clears It For the Future - ABC News
Do not war for peace. If you must war, war for justice. For without justice there is no peace. -me
We are who we choose to be.
R.I.P. Arielle. 08/20/2010-09/16/2012
10-11-12, 09:13 AM #2
Bout time the courts did something right
10-11-12, 09:40 AM #3
I don't know the specifics of the law, but I would hope the state has reasonable safeguards in place.
My state doesn't. I don't know that it's throwing off the vote here in a statistically meaningful way yet. Suppose I should investigate the vote here before I go telling South Carolina how to run their shop.
Originally Posted by William Pitt (the Younger), Speech in the House of Commons (18 November, 1783)
Users Browsing this Thread
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)