• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer
  • Home
  • About
  • The Magazine
  • Events
  • Partners
  • Products
  • Contact
  • Jobs and Careers
  • Advertise
  • Facebook
  • Instagram
  • Twitter
  • Subscribe
American Police Beat

American Police Beat Magazine

Law Enforcement Publication

  • Home
  • Leadership
    • Perpetual recognition of line-of-duty deaths
      Understanding the boundaries of professional relationships with the...
      Why you should lead from 30,000 feet
      Public perception and trust
      When performance reviews are a waste of time
  • Topics
    • Leadership
      • Perpetual recognition of line-of-duty deaths
        Understanding the boundaries of professional relationships with the...
        Why you should lead from 30,000 feet
        Public perception and trust
        When performance reviews are a waste of time
    • Editor’s Picks
      • Let’s get moving!
        Heroes of the World Trade Center
        The Promise Gap
        Corruption, collusion and impunity
        Liability challenges in contemporary policing
    • On the Job
      • Testing the waters — literally
        Frankpledge to forensics: A brief history of law enforcement
        Villains and heroes in the Big Apple
        Right place, right time — again
        Some good news on crime
    • Labor
      • The Promise Gap
        Cut the cops, save a dollar?
        Labor release under fire
        Who’s watching the watchmen?
        Crime and punishment (or lack thereof) in Seattle
    • Tech
      • New Mexico license plate readers save lives, lead to “precise...
        A modern field guide to understanding research in policing
        Gear that moves with you
        A new breed of cop car
        The future of patrol is here
    • Training
      • Pushback as a training signal
        Let’s get moving!
        The five minutes before the ambulance
        Navigating danger
        Critical thinking in police training
    • Policy
      • Police pause license plate readers
        Corruption, collusion and impunity
        E-bikes spark public safety concerns
        Try racing without wheels
        Law enforcement accreditation: Why it matters
    • Health/Wellness
      • Addressing stress, vicarious trauma and burnout
        Nervous system regulation
        The nature of the job
        Promoting organizational wellness
        Telling cops to get more sleep isn’t working
    • Community
      • Improving autism awareness
        Shop with a Cop
        Community engagement: What is it moving forward?
        Contradictory crossroads
        Back-to-school season brings out police support nationwide
    • Offbeat
      • An unexpected burglar
        Police humor only a cop would understand
        Not eggzactly a perfect heist
        Pizza … with a side of alligator?
        Wisconsin man charged with impersonating Border Patrol agent twice in...
    • We Remember
      • A Tribute to Fallen Heroes
        Markers of service and remembrance
        Tragedy strikes Baker to Vegas
        Heroes of the World Trade Center
        Forty heroes: United Airlines Flight 93
    • HOT Mail
      • The War on Cops Continues Unabated
  • On the Job
    • Testing the waters — literally
      Frankpledge to forensics: A brief history of law enforcement
      Villains and heroes in the Big Apple
      Right place, right time — again
      Some good news on crime
  • Labor
    • The Promise Gap
      Cut the cops, save a dollar?
      Labor release under fire
      Who’s watching the watchmen?
      Crime and punishment (or lack thereof) in Seattle
  • Tech
    • New Mexico license plate readers save lives, lead to “precise...
      A modern field guide to understanding research in policing
      Gear that moves with you
      A new breed of cop car
      The future of patrol is here
  • Training
    • Pushback as a training signal
      Let’s get moving!
      The five minutes before the ambulance
      Navigating danger
      Critical thinking in police training
  • Policy
    • Police pause license plate readers
      Corruption, collusion and impunity
      E-bikes spark public safety concerns
      Try racing without wheels
      Law enforcement accreditation: Why it matters
  • Health/Wellness
    • Addressing stress, vicarious trauma and burnout
      Nervous system regulation
      The nature of the job
      Promoting organizational wellness
      Telling cops to get more sleep isn’t working
  • Community
    • Improving autism awareness
      Shop with a Cop
      Community engagement: What is it moving forward?
      Contradictory crossroads
      Back-to-school season brings out police support nationwide
  • Offbeat
    • An unexpected burglar
      Police humor only a cop would understand
      Not eggzactly a perfect heist
      Pizza … with a side of alligator?
      Wisconsin man charged with impersonating Border Patrol agent twice in...
  • We Remember
    • A Tribute to Fallen Heroes
      Markers of service and remembrance
      Tragedy strikes Baker to Vegas
      Heroes of the World Trade Center
      Forty heroes: United Airlines Flight 93
  • HOT Mail
    • The War on Cops Continues Unabated
  • About
  • The Magazine
  • Events
  • Partners
  • Products
  • Contact
  • Jobs and Careers
  • Advertise
  • Subscribe
Search

Tech

California sheriff’s department pays $1.1 million to cyber criminals following ransomware attack

APB Team Published May 20, 2023 @ 3:00 pm PDT

iStock.com/Sashkinw

Officials with the San Bernadino County Sheriff’s Department in California has confirmed that the department paid a $1.1 million ransom to cyber criminals following a cyberattack that crippled police and County computer systems.

The ransomware attack, discovered in early April, resulted in the temporary shutdown of several computer systems, such as emails, in-car computers and law enforcement databases. A system used by deputies to conduct background checks was among those affected.

After negotiations with the hackers, San Bernardino County decided to pay slightly under half of the total ransom, amounting to $511,852, while the remaining amount was covered by the County’s insurance carrier.

According to County spokesman David Wert, the decision to pay the ransom was the most responsible course of action and “consistent with how other agencies have handled these types of situations.”

Ransomware attacks involve criminals infiltrating a system and encrypting the data with malware, rendering it inaccessible to the owner. The victim then typically pays a ransom in cryptocurrency, which is difficult to trace, in exchange for a decryption key to unlock the data.

Initially, the County provided minimal public information about the hack, referring to it as a “network disruption.”

Despite the attack, Sheriff Shannon Dicus confirmed that public safety was not compromised and officers were able to fulfil their duties, even though deputies had to adopt alternative methods for certain tasks.

For instance, access to the California Law Enforcement Telecommunications System (CLETS), which alerts deputies about individuals wanted for crimes outside the county, was unavailable, so deputies had to request other agencies to check CLETS records instead.

The investigation is still ongoing to determine whether any information was stolen or the ransom payment can be traced to identify the hackers. Gloria Huerta, a spokesperson for the Sheriff’s Department, stated that the department is still assessing the extent of the impact on their systems. Functioning and secure systems are being restored gradually.

According to cybersecurity experts, paying ransoms sets a precedent and emboldens criminals.

Georgetown University Professor Chuck Brooks and others argue against paying ransomware demands. “Generally, businesses should not pay for ransomware as they will likely be hit over and over again as it will be shared and sold by criminal hackers on the dark web,” he explained.

Numerous municipalities and organizations have paid ransoms in the past, including Jackson County in Georgia, Delaware County in Pennsylvania and Montgomery County in Alabama. However, Suffolk County in New York spent $17 million to restore its network after refusing to pay a $2.5 million ransom.

Law enforcement agencies rarely pay ransoms due to several factors. One concern is the anonymity of cryptocurrency transactions, as it is challenging to verify the recipient’s identity. This raises the possibility of payments reaching sanctioned entities like Iran and North Korea or terrorist organizations.

Additionally, paying ransoms can have significant reputational consequences, particularly for police agencies, which are expected to uphold public safety rather than engage in transactions with criminals.

In the case of San Bernadino County, experts say the attack on such a high-profile agency was embarrassing.

Law enforcement sources indicate that the hackers responsible for the San Bernardino County Sheriff’s Department attack likely operated out of Eastern Europe. These hackers are affiliated with a broader network of Russian hacking operations known for targeting U.S. entities and extorting untraceable payouts.

The Sheriff’s Department is conducting a forensic examination of the cyberattack, with the findings intended to assist other public agencies in preventing similar incidents. The Federal Bureau of Investigation is also involved in the investigation.

Ransomware attacks on public institutions such as cities, school districts and hospitals have spiked in recent years.

Experts say that government computer networks are usually attacked because they often store sensitive data but tend to have fewer robust protections compared to major private companies.

The FBI advises against paying ransoms in such attacks and does not engage in such transactions. However, according to a survey by Sophos, nearly half of state and local governments affected by ransomware attacks paid the hackers, making governments the second-highest industry to pay ransoms, surpassed only by K–12 schools.

Recent notable ransomware victims include the UC San Francisco Medical School, which was forced to pay $1.14 million (or 116 in bitcoin) to restore access to its data; the Azusa Police Department, which was hit twice within a span of three years; and the City of Baltimore in 2019. The city spent $18 million in recovery costs, according to the L.A. Times.

Categories: Tech Tags: ransomware, San Bernadino County Sheriff’s Office, cryptocurrency, FBI, data, cyber criminals, ransom, cybersecurity, hackers, cyberattack

Primary Sidebar

Recent Articles

  • Perpetual recognition of line-of-duty deaths
  • A Tribute to Fallen Heroes
  • NLEOMF Fund announces March 2026 Officers of the Month
  • Markers of service and remembrance
  • Testing the waters — literally
  • Police pause license plate readers
  • Tragedy strikes Baker to Vegas
  • Frankpledge to forensics: A brief history of law enforcement
  • Pushback as a training signal
  • Let’s get moving!

Footer

Our Mission
To serve as a trusted voice of the nation’s law enforcement community, providing informative, entertaining and inspiring content on interesting and engaging topics affecting peace officers today.

Contact us: info@apbweb.com | (800) 234-0056.

  • Facebook
  • Instagram
  • Twitter

Categories

  • Editor’s Picks
  • On the Job
  • Labor
  • Tech
  • Training
  • Policy
  • Health/Wellness
  • Community
  • Offbeat
  • We Remember
  • Jobs and Careers
  • Events

Editor’s Picks

Let’s get moving!

Let’s get moving!

April 27, 2026

Heroes of the World Trade Center

Heroes of the World Trade Center

April 24, 2026

The Promise Gap

The Promise Gap

April 22, 2026

Corruption, collusion and impunity

Corruption, collusion and impunity

April 21, 2026

Policies | Consent Preferences | Copyright © 2026 APB Media, LLC | Website design, development and maintenance by 911MEDIA

Open

Subscribe

Close

Receive the latest news and updates from American Police Beat directly to your inbox!

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.