• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer
  • Home
  • About
  • The Magazine
  • Events
  • Partners
  • Products
  • Contact
  • Jobs and Careers
  • Advertise
  • Facebook
  • Instagram
  • Twitter
  • Subscribe
American Police Beat

American Police Beat Magazine

Law Enforcement Publication

  • Home
  • Leadership
    • Hardcore experts should not be decision-makers!
      Law enforcement’s missing weapon
      Leadership with heart
      Smart power
      Can your staff keep pace with your leadership goals?
  • Topics
    • Leadership
      • Hardcore experts should not be decision-makers!
        Law enforcement’s missing weapon
        Leadership with heart
        Smart power
        Can your staff keep pace with your leadership goals?
    • Editor’s Picks
      • Effective in-service training
        Smart power
        Is anyone listening?
        A Christmas loss
        Mental health checks … in the training room?
    • On the Job
      • Fatherly instincts save boy from icy water
        More than a call for service
        Has law enforcement changed?
        SROs in action
        Stay in your lane
    • Labor
      • Who’s watching the watchmen?
        Crime and punishment (or lack thereof) in Seattle
        Labor leadership out in the field
        When you are falsely accused
        Is anyone listening?
    • Tech
      • Gear that moves with you
        A new breed of cop car
        The future of patrol is here
        New York governor highlights $24 million investment to modernize law...
        Cutting-edge police technology
    • Training
      • Hit the pause button
        Effective in-service training
        The untrained trainer
        The vision behind precision
        Mentorship: Ensuring future success
    • Policy
      • Policing the police
        Utah repeals ban on collective bargaining
        Violence against officers is on the rise
        New Mexico’s Law Enforcement Retention Fund keeps experienced,...
        The phenomenon of trauma bonding in law enforcement
    • Health/Wellness
      • Fit for duty
        Maintain your mental armor
        Beyond crisis response
        Mental health checks … in the training room?
        Surviving and thriving in retirement
    • Community
      • Shop with a Cop
        Community engagement: What is it moving forward?
        Contradictory crossroads
        Back-to-school season brings out police support nationwide
        A bold idea for reducing homelessness in America
    • Offbeat
      • An unexpected burglar
        Police humor only a cop would understand
        Not eggzactly a perfect heist
        Pizza … with a side of alligator?
        Wisconsin man charged with impersonating Border Patrol agent twice in...
    • We Remember
      • A nation propelled to war, lives changed forever
        A Christmas loss
        York County ambush leaves three officers dead, others critically...
        Honoring the Fallen Heroes of 9/11
        Team Romeo
    • HOT Mail
      • The War on Cops Continues Unabated
  • On the Job
    • Fatherly instincts save boy from icy water
      More than a call for service
      Has law enforcement changed?
      SROs in action
      Stay in your lane
  • Labor
    • Who’s watching the watchmen?
      Crime and punishment (or lack thereof) in Seattle
      Labor leadership out in the field
      When you are falsely accused
      Is anyone listening?
  • Tech
    • Gear that moves with you
      A new breed of cop car
      The future of patrol is here
      New York governor highlights $24 million investment to modernize law...
      Cutting-edge police technology
  • Training
    • Hit the pause button
      Effective in-service training
      The untrained trainer
      The vision behind precision
      Mentorship: Ensuring future success
  • Policy
    • Policing the police
      Utah repeals ban on collective bargaining
      Violence against officers is on the rise
      New Mexico’s Law Enforcement Retention Fund keeps experienced,...
      The phenomenon of trauma bonding in law enforcement
  • Health/Wellness
    • Fit for duty
      Maintain your mental armor
      Beyond crisis response
      Mental health checks … in the training room?
      Surviving and thriving in retirement
  • Community
    • Shop with a Cop
      Community engagement: What is it moving forward?
      Contradictory crossroads
      Back-to-school season brings out police support nationwide
      A bold idea for reducing homelessness in America
  • Offbeat
    • An unexpected burglar
      Police humor only a cop would understand
      Not eggzactly a perfect heist
      Pizza … with a side of alligator?
      Wisconsin man charged with impersonating Border Patrol agent twice in...
  • We Remember
    • A nation propelled to war, lives changed forever
      A Christmas loss
      York County ambush leaves three officers dead, others critically...
      Honoring the Fallen Heroes of 9/11
      Team Romeo
  • HOT Mail
    • The War on Cops Continues Unabated
  • About
  • The Magazine
  • Events
  • Partners
  • Products
  • Contact
  • Jobs and Careers
  • Advertise
  • Subscribe
Search

Policy

Virtual currencies: Policy considerations

Olin Rankin Published August 25, 2021 @ 8:00 am PDT

iStock.com/Nuthawut Somsuk

Policies have had a poor reputation in the law enforcement community for many years. We have all heard about a new policy written because of someone’s poor action or bad decision. Some of us even look at policies as a way of limiting our decision-making or hindering our ability to do our job. But if we stop and consider reality, policies are there to protect us as well as our agencies, and maybe we should learn to appreciate them. A well-written policy should provide you with a road map for daily operations and help you perform your job, not inhibit you.

When working in a world that involves virtual currencies, policies are important and necessary. Whether your agency has a virtual currency policy or needs one, there are a few things that should be considered. For example, does your policy protect only the seizure of assets? Should it encompass the use of virtual currency in investigations? What is the proper method of storing virtual currency? Should it be stored? Should it be converted and then stored? How is this accomplished operationally? 

Cryptocurrencies can have high volatility, and this is something agencies must contemplate when making policy decisions. When seizing assets including virtual currencies, with their fluctuation in value, agencies need to ensure that their policy clearly indicates what should be done with those funds while awaiting court proceedings. One must examine the upside and downside with every method. Consider the following examples. An officer seizes Bitcoin and converts it to USD, and the value of Bitcoin increases by $20,000. The officer then loses the seizure hearing. The suspect may say that the officer now owes them the $20,000 difference because they would not have sold the Bitcoin. Or alternatively, the officer holds the Bitcoin and the value drops by $20,000. The suspect will claim the officer owes them yet again because they would have sold the bitcoin at the higher value and their loss (due to the officer’s actions) is again $20,000. If the officer follows agency policy, they will be protected and may have fewer legal challenges. 

Current best practice recommendations are to hold the virtual currency asset as it was seized, much as you would do with a house or a vehicle. You wouldn’t seize a home, auction it and show up to the seizure hearing with cash. Your policy should dictate the specific action for each asset seized, and you should always follow that policy to protect yourself and your agency from litigation. 

So now we know what we are going to do once we’ve obtained the cryptocurrency, but how do we actually seize it? Your policy should dictate how funds will be moved. If you are dealing with a compliant exchange, or one that will cooperate with legal service, you should present legal service. Keep in mind that there are other things to consider and plan for. If your suspect is aware of your seizure attempts, then exigency exists to move those funds out immediately. Once cryptocurrency is moved from a wallet, you are now back at square one trying to follow the funds. If you find yourself needing to move funds without serving legal service to an exchange, you will need to create an agency-controlled wallet. Do not make the mistake of using a personal wallet to move the funds. Everything an officer uses should be created, owned and controlled by the agency. This includes the computer used to create a wallet, the wallet itself, etc. Ensure that any actions taken during the seizure are witnessed by a third party that is affiliated with your agency and can attest that the proper steps were taken by all parties, and all actions are documented.

If there are multiple wallets within the same case, current best practices recommend having a separate wallet for each suspect wallet to ensure there is no comingling of any funds. Should an officer lose a hearing on one out of four wallets, then it is easier to transfer the affected wallet or funds back to the suspect. Regarding transfers, your policy should clearly explain the seizure process, including performing a test transaction from the suspect’s wallet to the agency wallet before moving all of the funds. This trial can be a nominal amount of cryptocurrency, just to ensure that the addresses have been listed correctly and there are no typos. Please keep in mind that with cryptocurrency, once the transaction is sent, it cannot be undone. If you send the funds to the wrong address, you could be liable for the losses.

Cryptocurrency controlled by an agency must have a thorough audit policy and procedure to ensure those assets aren’t stolen or moved without approval. Current best practices recommend quarterly random audits at a minimum. If your agency is storing funds at an exchange, such as Coinbase, there is an option to submit audit reports on a schedule. This ensures that if the funds were misused or stolen, the responsible party could quickly isolate the timeframe of the offense.

The agency policy should also clearly identify who may authorize the use of virtual funds in active investigations such as undercover purchases, prostitution cases or vice operations. As with traditional currencies, if too many people can authorize the use of the funds, then it becomes much harder to determine the “chain of custody” of those funds. Current best practices recommend having no more than two people authorized to use cryptocurrency assets and require a report or memo generated each time a request is made for logging purposes. At a minimum, the report should include the case number, the requesting party, the authorizing party and how the funds were to be used. This safeguard may reduce access and abuse of the assets.

For cryptocurrency policies, many crucial items need to be included. This information is designed to give agencies and officers a road map for operational decisions related to cases involving virtual currency, but it is not meant to be all-inclusive. Ultimately, the goal is to reduce the likelihood of abuse, errors or “lost” funds. Anytime funds are going to be transferred or used, there needs to be good policy and a clear documentation trail to protect everyone.

Model cryptocurrency policy and other important resources can be found at nw3c.org/investigative-resources#CryptocurrencyResources. 

Olin Rankin

Olin Rankin

Olin Rankin is a high-tech crimes specialist with NW3C. Olin teaches classes such as Dark Web, Virtual Currency and Basic Digital Forensic Analysis. Additionally, he develops and tests course content that specializes in computer forensics and investigative techniques. During his 15-year career in law enforcement, Olin found a way to combine his passion for technology and serving the public. He rounded out his tenure as the supervisor for the Computer Forensics Lab, which oversaw all aspects of cases that had a digital or technical element to them, including evidence collection, evidence preservation, acquisition and analysis. 

View articles by Olin Rankin

As seen in the August 2021 issue of American Police Beat magazine.
Don’t miss out on another issue today! Click below:

SUBSCRIBE TODAY!

Categories: Policy

Primary Sidebar

Recent Articles

  • Who’s watching the watchmen?
  • Crime and punishment (or lack thereof) in Seattle
  • Fatherly instincts save boy from icy water
  • More than a call for service
  • National Law Enforcement Officers Memorial Fund announces December 2025 Officers of the Month
  • Hardcore experts should not be decision-makers!
  • Law enforcement’s missing weapon
  • Has law enforcement changed?
  • Leadership with heart
  • SROs in action

Footer

Our Mission
To serve as a trusted voice of the nation’s law enforcement community, providing informative, entertaining and inspiring content on interesting and engaging topics affecting peace officers today.

Contact us: info@apbweb.com | (800) 234-0056.

  • Facebook
  • Instagram
  • Twitter

Categories

  • Editor’s Picks
  • On the Job
  • Labor
  • Tech
  • Training
  • Policy
  • Health/Wellness
  • Community
  • Offbeat
  • We Remember
  • Jobs and Careers
  • Events

Editor’s Picks

Effective in-service training

Effective in-service training

January 06, 2026

Smart power

Smart power

December 25, 2025

Is anyone listening?

Is anyone listening?

December 19, 2025

A Christmas loss

A Christmas loss

December 10, 2025

Policies | Consent Preferences | Copyright © 2026 APB Media, LLC | Website design, development and maintenance by 911MEDIA

Open

Subscribe

Close

Receive the latest news and updates from American Police Beat directly to your inbox!

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.