• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer
  • Home
  • About
  • The Magazine
  • Events
  • Partners
  • Products
  • Contact
  • Jobs and Careers
  • Advertise
  • Facebook
  • Instagram
  • Twitter
  • Subscribe
American Police Beat

American Police Beat Magazine

Law Enforcement Publication

  • Home
  • Leadership
    • Smart power
      Can your staff keep pace with your leadership goals?
      Your agency needs you
      Pursuit termination option: Radiator disablement
      Liability — not always a showstopper!
  • Topics
    • Leadership
      • Smart power
        Can your staff keep pace with your leadership goals?
        Your agency needs you
        Pursuit termination option: Radiator disablement
        Liability — not always a showstopper!
    • Editor’s Picks
      • Mental health checks … in the training room?
        Crime doesn’t take a vacation
        The power of mediation
        Therapy isn’t just for the broken
        Police humor only a cop would understand
    • On the Job
      • Stay in your lane
        Santa’s helpers
        The power of calm-edy
        Domestic violence
        Code Red, all hands on deck
    • Labor
      • Labor leadership out in the field
        When you are falsely accused
        Is anyone listening?
        The power of mediation
        Differentiation in police recruitment
    • Tech
      • Gear that moves with you
        A new breed of cop car
        The future of patrol is here
        New York governor highlights $24 million investment to modernize law...
        Cutting-edge police technology
    • Training
      • Hit the pause button
        Effective in-service training
        The untrained trainer
        The vision behind precision
        Mentorship: Ensuring future success
    • Policy
      • Policing the police
        Utah repeals ban on collective bargaining
        Violence against officers is on the rise
        New Mexico’s Law Enforcement Retention Fund keeps experienced,...
        The phenomenon of trauma bonding in law enforcement
    • Health/Wellness
      • Fit for duty
        Maintain your mental armor
        Beyond crisis response
        Mental health checks … in the training room?
        Surviving and thriving in retirement
    • Community
      • Shop with a Cop
        Community engagement: What is it moving forward?
        Contradictory crossroads
        Back-to-school season brings out police support nationwide
        A bold idea for reducing homelessness in America
    • Offbeat
      • An unexpected burglar
        Police humor only a cop would understand
        Not eggzactly a perfect heist
        Pizza … with a side of alligator?
        Wisconsin man charged with impersonating Border Patrol agent twice in...
    • We Remember
      • A nation propelled to war, lives changed forever
        A Christmas loss
        York County ambush leaves three officers dead, others critically...
        Honoring the Fallen Heroes of 9/11
        Team Romeo
    • HOT Mail
      • The War on Cops Continues Unabated
  • On the Job
    • Stay in your lane
      Santa’s helpers
      The power of calm-edy
      Domestic violence
      Code Red, all hands on deck
  • Labor
    • Labor leadership out in the field
      When you are falsely accused
      Is anyone listening?
      The power of mediation
      Differentiation in police recruitment
  • Tech
    • Gear that moves with you
      A new breed of cop car
      The future of patrol is here
      New York governor highlights $24 million investment to modernize law...
      Cutting-edge police technology
  • Training
    • Hit the pause button
      Effective in-service training
      The untrained trainer
      The vision behind precision
      Mentorship: Ensuring future success
  • Policy
    • Policing the police
      Utah repeals ban on collective bargaining
      Violence against officers is on the rise
      New Mexico’s Law Enforcement Retention Fund keeps experienced,...
      The phenomenon of trauma bonding in law enforcement
  • Health/Wellness
    • Fit for duty
      Maintain your mental armor
      Beyond crisis response
      Mental health checks … in the training room?
      Surviving and thriving in retirement
  • Community
    • Shop with a Cop
      Community engagement: What is it moving forward?
      Contradictory crossroads
      Back-to-school season brings out police support nationwide
      A bold idea for reducing homelessness in America
  • Offbeat
    • An unexpected burglar
      Police humor only a cop would understand
      Not eggzactly a perfect heist
      Pizza … with a side of alligator?
      Wisconsin man charged with impersonating Border Patrol agent twice in...
  • We Remember
    • A nation propelled to war, lives changed forever
      A Christmas loss
      York County ambush leaves three officers dead, others critically...
      Honoring the Fallen Heroes of 9/11
      Team Romeo
  • HOT Mail
    • The War on Cops Continues Unabated
  • About
  • The Magazine
  • Events
  • Partners
  • Products
  • Contact
  • Jobs and Careers
  • Advertise
  • Subscribe
Search

Policy

Some California police departments are encrypting radio transmissions to protect personal information

APB Team Published January 12, 2022 @ 3:00 pm PST

iStock.com/KatarzynaBialasiewicz

A California Department of Justice mandate from a year ago is going into effect in many police stations as police radios are becoming more and more encrypted across the state.

The California DOJ bulletin called for law enforcement to implement radio encryption protocols to protect personally identifiable information (PII) such as names and driver’s licenses. So far, the Palo Alto, Mountain View, and San Francisco Police Department have at least partially encrypted their radio transmissions, which has led to concern among those of the public who make use of that information – namely the news media.

Following the move, the California Attorney General’s Office said that law enforcement should take “any necessary steps” to help reporters receive information.

“We generally would encourage law enforcement, in line with those requirements (to protect PII), to take any necessary steps to assist reporters in accessing the information they need to carry out their important work,” the AG’s press office said in a statement. “It is ultimately up to each agency to determine the appropriate approach.”

A requirement for using the California Law Enforcement Transmissions System (CLETS) is to take steps to protect PII, which can be done via encryption or other means. Officers use the system to gain access to driver’s records or individuals’ criminal histories. Since the DOJ’s reminder, police departments have opted to encrypt their transmissions.

Some departments have managed to implement partial encryptions. For example, the SFPD only encrypts transmissions regarding driver’s records, license plate information, criminal history and other personal information.

According to SFPD spokesman Adam Lobsinger, the public can still hear dispatchers send officers on calls and hear how the call ends via the Department of Emergency Management (DEM), although they miss some of the personal details.

“Effectively all police department traffic will be encrypted, Lobsinger said. “Almost no police radio traffic will be heard, and what is left unencrypted is going to be on the Department of Emergency Management side,” he said.

In addition, because the SFPD has switched from analog to digital radios, listeners must use a compatible Project 25, phase 2 scanner to hear the broadcasts.

The San Francisco Department of Emergency Management, which routes 911 calls to police and fire units, assured that listeners can still hear information about incidents like shootings, along with their location, in addition to officer-initiated events like traffic stops from dispatchers.

Privacy law experts noted their concern about the encryption, arguing that police radio traffic is a necessary public resource.

“These radio transmissions are an important window the public has into what police do,” David Snyder, executive director of the First Amendment Coalition said in an interview with BuzzFeed News.

Not all departments are on board with the encryption protocols. For instance, the LAPD has only partially encrypted sensitive information, and the CHP has avoided encryption entirely.

Categories: Policy Tags: news media, San Francisco Police Department, police scanner, Law Enforcement, California, privacy, Department of Justice, radio transmissions, encryption, personally identifiable information

Primary Sidebar

Recent Articles

  • Policing the police
  • Labor leadership out in the field
  • Hit the pause button
  • A nation propelled to war, lives changed forever
  • Fit for duty
  • Stay in your lane
  • Utah repeals ban on collective bargaining
  • NLEOMF to host “Serving Those Who Serve” virtual forum on integrating police chaplaincy into law enforcement
  • Santa’s helpers
  • Shop with a Cop

Footer

Our Mission
To serve as a trusted voice of the nation’s law enforcement community, providing informative, entertaining and inspiring content on interesting and engaging topics affecting peace officers today.

Contact us: info@apbweb.com | (800) 234-0056.

  • Facebook
  • Instagram
  • Twitter

Categories

  • Editor’s Picks
  • On the Job
  • Labor
  • Tech
  • Training
  • Policy
  • Health/Wellness
  • Community
  • Offbeat
  • We Remember
  • Jobs and Careers
  • Events

Editor’s Picks

Mental health checks … in the training room?

Mental health checks … in the training room?

November 25, 2025

Crime doesn’t take a vacation

Crime doesn’t take a vacation

November 21, 2025

The power of mediation

The power of mediation

November 20, 2025

Therapy isn’t just for the broken

Therapy isn’t just for the broken

November 14, 2025

Policies | Consent Preferences | Copyright © 2026 APB Media, LLC | Website design, development and maintenance by 911MEDIA

Open

Subscribe

Close

Receive the latest news and updates from American Police Beat directly to your inbox!

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.