• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer
  • Home
  • About
  • The Magazine
  • Events
  • Partners
  • Products
  • Contact
  • Jobs and Careers
  • Advertise
  • Facebook
  • Instagram
  • Twitter
  • Subscribe
American Police Beat

American Police Beat Magazine

Law Enforcement Publication

  • Home
  • Leadership
    • When performance reviews are a waste of time
      Taking a page from Toyota’s playbook
      Tattoos can be self-inflicted handicaps
      Hardcore experts should not be decision-makers!
      Law enforcement’s missing weapon
  • Topics
    • Leadership
      • When performance reviews are a waste of time
        Taking a page from Toyota’s playbook
        Tattoos can be self-inflicted handicaps
        Hardcore experts should not be decision-makers!
        Law enforcement’s missing weapon
    • Editor’s Picks
      • Law enforcement’s missing weapon
        Has law enforcement changed?
        Policing the police
        Fit for duty
        Effective in-service training
    • On the Job
      • Fatherly instincts save boy from icy water
        More than a call for service
        Has law enforcement changed?
        SROs in action
        Stay in your lane
    • Labor
      • Who’s watching the watchmen?
        Crime and punishment (or lack thereof) in Seattle
        Labor leadership out in the field
        When you are falsely accused
        Is anyone listening?
    • Tech
      • A modern field guide to understanding research in policing
        Gear that moves with you
        A new breed of cop car
        The future of patrol is here
        New York governor highlights $24 million investment to modernize law...
    • Training
      • Threshold neuroscience
        Integrated virtual reality training
        Hit the pause button
        Effective in-service training
        The untrained trainer
    • Policy
      • Law enforcement accreditation: Why it matters
        Liability challenges in contemporary policing
        The war on drugs is evolving
        Drug policy and enforcement
        Policing the police
    • Health/Wellness
      • Proactive wellness visits
        Fit for duty
        Maintain your mental armor
        Beyond crisis response
        Mental health checks … in the training room?
    • Community
      • Shop with a Cop
        Community engagement: What is it moving forward?
        Contradictory crossroads
        Back-to-school season brings out police support nationwide
        A bold idea for reducing homelessness in America
    • Offbeat
      • An unexpected burglar
        Police humor only a cop would understand
        Not eggzactly a perfect heist
        Pizza … with a side of alligator?
        Wisconsin man charged with impersonating Border Patrol agent twice in...
    • We Remember
      • The Pentagon
        A nation propelled to war, lives changed forever
        A Christmas loss
        York County ambush leaves three officers dead, others critically...
        Honoring the Fallen Heroes of 9/11
    • HOT Mail
      • The War on Cops Continues Unabated
  • On the Job
    • Fatherly instincts save boy from icy water
      More than a call for service
      Has law enforcement changed?
      SROs in action
      Stay in your lane
  • Labor
    • Who’s watching the watchmen?
      Crime and punishment (or lack thereof) in Seattle
      Labor leadership out in the field
      When you are falsely accused
      Is anyone listening?
  • Tech
    • A modern field guide to understanding research in policing
      Gear that moves with you
      A new breed of cop car
      The future of patrol is here
      New York governor highlights $24 million investment to modernize law...
  • Training
    • Threshold neuroscience
      Integrated virtual reality training
      Hit the pause button
      Effective in-service training
      The untrained trainer
  • Policy
    • Law enforcement accreditation: Why it matters
      Liability challenges in contemporary policing
      The war on drugs is evolving
      Drug policy and enforcement
      Policing the police
  • Health/Wellness
    • Proactive wellness visits
      Fit for duty
      Maintain your mental armor
      Beyond crisis response
      Mental health checks … in the training room?
  • Community
    • Shop with a Cop
      Community engagement: What is it moving forward?
      Contradictory crossroads
      Back-to-school season brings out police support nationwide
      A bold idea for reducing homelessness in America
  • Offbeat
    • An unexpected burglar
      Police humor only a cop would understand
      Not eggzactly a perfect heist
      Pizza … with a side of alligator?
      Wisconsin man charged with impersonating Border Patrol agent twice in...
  • We Remember
    • The Pentagon
      A nation propelled to war, lives changed forever
      A Christmas loss
      York County ambush leaves three officers dead, others critically...
      Honoring the Fallen Heroes of 9/11
  • HOT Mail
    • The War on Cops Continues Unabated
  • About
  • The Magazine
  • Events
  • Partners
  • Products
  • Contact
  • Jobs and Careers
  • Advertise
  • Subscribe
Search

Tech

California sheriff’s department pays $1.1 million to cyber criminals following ransomware attack

APB Team Published May 20, 2023 @ 3:00 pm PDT

iStock.com/Sashkinw

Officials with the San Bernadino County Sheriff’s Department in California has confirmed that the department paid a $1.1 million ransom to cyber criminals following a cyberattack that crippled police and County computer systems.

The ransomware attack, discovered in early April, resulted in the temporary shutdown of several computer systems, such as emails, in-car computers and law enforcement databases. A system used by deputies to conduct background checks was among those affected.

After negotiations with the hackers, San Bernardino County decided to pay slightly under half of the total ransom, amounting to $511,852, while the remaining amount was covered by the County’s insurance carrier.

According to County spokesman David Wert, the decision to pay the ransom was the most responsible course of action and “consistent with how other agencies have handled these types of situations.”

Ransomware attacks involve criminals infiltrating a system and encrypting the data with malware, rendering it inaccessible to the owner. The victim then typically pays a ransom in cryptocurrency, which is difficult to trace, in exchange for a decryption key to unlock the data.

Initially, the County provided minimal public information about the hack, referring to it as a “network disruption.”

Despite the attack, Sheriff Shannon Dicus confirmed that public safety was not compromised and officers were able to fulfil their duties, even though deputies had to adopt alternative methods for certain tasks.

For instance, access to the California Law Enforcement Telecommunications System (CLETS), which alerts deputies about individuals wanted for crimes outside the county, was unavailable, so deputies had to request other agencies to check CLETS records instead.

The investigation is still ongoing to determine whether any information was stolen or the ransom payment can be traced to identify the hackers. Gloria Huerta, a spokesperson for the Sheriff’s Department, stated that the department is still assessing the extent of the impact on their systems. Functioning and secure systems are being restored gradually.

According to cybersecurity experts, paying ransoms sets a precedent and emboldens criminals.

Georgetown University Professor Chuck Brooks and others argue against paying ransomware demands. “Generally, businesses should not pay for ransomware as they will likely be hit over and over again as it will be shared and sold by criminal hackers on the dark web,” he explained.

Numerous municipalities and organizations have paid ransoms in the past, including Jackson County in Georgia, Delaware County in Pennsylvania and Montgomery County in Alabama. However, Suffolk County in New York spent $17 million to restore its network after refusing to pay a $2.5 million ransom.

Law enforcement agencies rarely pay ransoms due to several factors. One concern is the anonymity of cryptocurrency transactions, as it is challenging to verify the recipient’s identity. This raises the possibility of payments reaching sanctioned entities like Iran and North Korea or terrorist organizations.

Additionally, paying ransoms can have significant reputational consequences, particularly for police agencies, which are expected to uphold public safety rather than engage in transactions with criminals.

In the case of San Bernadino County, experts say the attack on such a high-profile agency was embarrassing.

Law enforcement sources indicate that the hackers responsible for the San Bernardino County Sheriff’s Department attack likely operated out of Eastern Europe. These hackers are affiliated with a broader network of Russian hacking operations known for targeting U.S. entities and extorting untraceable payouts.

The Sheriff’s Department is conducting a forensic examination of the cyberattack, with the findings intended to assist other public agencies in preventing similar incidents. The Federal Bureau of Investigation is also involved in the investigation.

Ransomware attacks on public institutions such as cities, school districts and hospitals have spiked in recent years.

Experts say that government computer networks are usually attacked because they often store sensitive data but tend to have fewer robust protections compared to major private companies.

The FBI advises against paying ransoms in such attacks and does not engage in such transactions. However, according to a survey by Sophos, nearly half of state and local governments affected by ransomware attacks paid the hackers, making governments the second-highest industry to pay ransoms, surpassed only by K–12 schools.

Recent notable ransomware victims include the UC San Francisco Medical School, which was forced to pay $1.14 million (or 116 in bitcoin) to restore access to its data; the Azusa Police Department, which was hit twice within a span of three years; and the City of Baltimore in 2019. The city spent $18 million in recovery costs, according to the L.A. Times.

Categories: Tech Tags: FBI, data, cyber criminals, ransom, cybersecurity, hackers, cyberattack, ransomware, San Bernadino County Sheriff’s Office, cryptocurrency

Primary Sidebar

Recent Articles

  • National Law Enforcement Officers Memorial Fund announces January 2026 Officer of the Month
  • Law enforcement accreditation: Why it matters
  • Liability challenges in contemporary policing
  • When performance reviews are a waste of time
  • Proactive wellness visits
  • National Law Enforcement Museum to open “Without Warning: Ending the Terror of the D.C. Snipers” exhibit
  • Taking a page from Toyota’s playbook
  • National Law Enforcement Museum hosts inaugural Pathways in Criminal Justice Career Fair Series event
  • A modern field guide to understanding research in policing
  • Tattoos can be self-inflicted handicaps

Footer

Our Mission
To serve as a trusted voice of the nation’s law enforcement community, providing informative, entertaining and inspiring content on interesting and engaging topics affecting peace officers today.

Contact us: info@apbweb.com | (800) 234-0056.

  • Facebook
  • Instagram
  • Twitter

Categories

  • Editor’s Picks
  • On the Job
  • Labor
  • Tech
  • Training
  • Policy
  • Health/Wellness
  • Community
  • Offbeat
  • We Remember
  • Jobs and Careers
  • Events

Editor’s Picks

Law enforcement’s missing weapon

Law enforcement’s missing weapon

January 28, 2026

Has law enforcement changed?

Has law enforcement changed?

January 26, 2026

Policing the police

Policing the police

January 23, 2026

Fit for duty

Fit for duty

January 19, 2026

Policies | Consent Preferences | Copyright © 2026 APB Media, LLC | Website design, development and maintenance by 911MEDIA

Open

Subscribe

Close

Receive the latest news and updates from American Police Beat directly to your inbox!

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.