• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer
  • Home
  • About
  • The Magazine
  • Events
  • Partners
  • Products
  • Contact
  • Jobs and Careers
  • Advertise
  • Facebook
  • Instagram
  • Twitter
  • Subscribe
American Police Beat

American Police Beat Magazine

Law Enforcement Publication

  • Home
  • Leadership
    • Tattoos can be self-inflicted handicaps
      Hardcore experts should not be decision-makers!
      Law enforcement’s missing weapon
      Leadership with heart
      Smart power
  • Topics
    • Leadership
      • Tattoos can be self-inflicted handicaps
        Hardcore experts should not be decision-makers!
        Law enforcement’s missing weapon
        Leadership with heart
        Smart power
    • Editor’s Picks
      • Law enforcement’s missing weapon
        Has law enforcement changed?
        Policing the police
        Fit for duty
        Effective in-service training
    • On the Job
      • Fatherly instincts save boy from icy water
        More than a call for service
        Has law enforcement changed?
        SROs in action
        Stay in your lane
    • Labor
      • Who’s watching the watchmen?
        Crime and punishment (or lack thereof) in Seattle
        Labor leadership out in the field
        When you are falsely accused
        Is anyone listening?
    • Tech
      • A modern field guide to understanding research in policing
        Gear that moves with you
        A new breed of cop car
        The future of patrol is here
        New York governor highlights $24 million investment to modernize law...
    • Training
      • Threshold neuroscience
        Integrated virtual reality training
        Hit the pause button
        Effective in-service training
        The untrained trainer
    • Policy
      • The war on drugs is evolving
        Drug policy and enforcement
        Policing the police
        Utah repeals ban on collective bargaining
        Violence against officers is on the rise
    • Health/Wellness
      • Fit for duty
        Maintain your mental armor
        Beyond crisis response
        Mental health checks … in the training room?
        Surviving and thriving in retirement
    • Community
      • Shop with a Cop
        Community engagement: What is it moving forward?
        Contradictory crossroads
        Back-to-school season brings out police support nationwide
        A bold idea for reducing homelessness in America
    • Offbeat
      • An unexpected burglar
        Police humor only a cop would understand
        Not eggzactly a perfect heist
        Pizza … with a side of alligator?
        Wisconsin man charged with impersonating Border Patrol agent twice in...
    • We Remember
      • The Pentagon
        A nation propelled to war, lives changed forever
        A Christmas loss
        York County ambush leaves three officers dead, others critically...
        Honoring the Fallen Heroes of 9/11
    • HOT Mail
      • The War on Cops Continues Unabated
  • On the Job
    • Fatherly instincts save boy from icy water
      More than a call for service
      Has law enforcement changed?
      SROs in action
      Stay in your lane
  • Labor
    • Who’s watching the watchmen?
      Crime and punishment (or lack thereof) in Seattle
      Labor leadership out in the field
      When you are falsely accused
      Is anyone listening?
  • Tech
    • A modern field guide to understanding research in policing
      Gear that moves with you
      A new breed of cop car
      The future of patrol is here
      New York governor highlights $24 million investment to modernize law...
  • Training
    • Threshold neuroscience
      Integrated virtual reality training
      Hit the pause button
      Effective in-service training
      The untrained trainer
  • Policy
    • The war on drugs is evolving
      Drug policy and enforcement
      Policing the police
      Utah repeals ban on collective bargaining
      Violence against officers is on the rise
  • Health/Wellness
    • Fit for duty
      Maintain your mental armor
      Beyond crisis response
      Mental health checks … in the training room?
      Surviving and thriving in retirement
  • Community
    • Shop with a Cop
      Community engagement: What is it moving forward?
      Contradictory crossroads
      Back-to-school season brings out police support nationwide
      A bold idea for reducing homelessness in America
  • Offbeat
    • An unexpected burglar
      Police humor only a cop would understand
      Not eggzactly a perfect heist
      Pizza … with a side of alligator?
      Wisconsin man charged with impersonating Border Patrol agent twice in...
  • We Remember
    • The Pentagon
      A nation propelled to war, lives changed forever
      A Christmas loss
      York County ambush leaves three officers dead, others critically...
      Honoring the Fallen Heroes of 9/11
  • HOT Mail
    • The War on Cops Continues Unabated
  • About
  • The Magazine
  • Events
  • Partners
  • Products
  • Contact
  • Jobs and Careers
  • Advertise
  • Subscribe
Search

Policy

Understanding LEOSA

It’s a law, not a House resolution

Dave Bryant Published February 16, 2024 @ 6:00 am PST

iStock.com/RonBailey

The year 2024 marks two decades since H.R. 218 was passed and became law. It’s way past time that law enforcement professionals, especially firearms instructors, understand it and refer to it by the proper name. Calling this law “House Resolution 218” makes us sound ignorant of basic civics. Do you put clips in your assault rifle? The Law Enforcement Officers Safety Act is a great federal law that is widely misunderstood because we can’t help reading into it or trying to pretend it is more restrictive than it is.

First off, a disclaimer: I am not an attorney. I’m not qualified to give legal advice. Read the law for yourself. It is 18 USC 926 (b)(c). Talk to your legal representative and ask questions of lawyers who work with this law and are up to date on the cases where it has been used.

Basically, LEOSA allows law enforcement officers and qualified retired LEOs to carry guns in any jurisdiction of the United States without the worry of state and local laws. As with any law, definitions are important. Read them. The statute defines who is covered and what is qualified. Every state has standards for active LEOs, so they are good with their credentials. Retirees need to have a photo identification from the agency they separated from, showing that they were an armed, sworn law enforcement officer with at least 10 years of service. 

As with any law, definitions are important. Read them. The statute defines who is covered and what is qualified.

Retirees also need to have a qualifications card showing they passed a firearms qualification from either the agency they retired from or from a state law enforcement firearms instructor in the state they currently reside in, dated in the past 12 months. Note that it is not just any instructor. It must be an instructor who is approved by the state to train and certify law enforcement officers in that state. In my state, the Florida Department of Law Enforcement (FDLE) sets the standards for police training and instructors. FDLE issues me numbered cards that I then sign and issue to those who I witness passing the state standard qualification course each year. It is a simple 40-round course of fire that can be done on a private range. It is not training but merely a proficiency exam demonstrating that the shooter met the minimum requirements of being safe and effective. 

Every state has its own course, but sadly, some have abused the intent of this federal law by imposing overly difficult standards, creating obstacles to those wanting to exercise their legal privilege. Some have even tried to declare that federal law does not apply in their jurisdiction. However, unless their state formally secedes from the union, they must follow federal law. Case law is very clear that LEOSA is good law and is routinely interpreted in a manner beneficial to the individual officer. Still, we hear rumors of places challenging it. Usually, these turn out to be just boisterous politicians pandering to fear and ignorance in left-leaning states rather than actual enforcement efforts. Still, it is worth discussing how one might act in situations where the law comes into common use. 

If you must use deadly force, you should follow all the things you were taught. Ensure your safety by dealing with the threat, scanning for additional threats, calling for help, rendering aid, etc. When the good guys arrive, be sure you aren’t mistaken for the criminal. Have your weapon secure or out of your hand so you don’t appear to be a threat to the responding officers or any other concealed carriers. Identify yourself and consider giving a brief overview of what happened and why you needed to use deadly force. However, you should remember that you are the subject of a criminal investigation, so it is wise to have some professional legal advice before you make any statements or answer questions. I highly recommend special insurance policies like those offered by CCW Safe, USCCA and other gun rights organizations. The cost of defending even the cleanest shooting can bankrupt most of us. 

For the more likely encounter with an officer from another jurisdiction, such as a traffic stop, I recommend making it as safe and easy for everyone as possible. I pull over to a safe spot, leaving plenty of room for this officer, who has no idea that I’m one of the good guys, too. I open all my windows and turn on my interior lights. I display my credentials on the steering wheel by the fingers of my empty, open hands when he makes his approach. I greet him verbally without any movements that could be alarming. It is his stop, and I am submitting to his authority. My weapon is out of sight and secure on my body. There is no need to produce it. Typically, the conversation will pivot to congenial cop talk, but should things take an adversarial turn, it’s time to consider your rights. Questions about bullet type or magazine capacity are clues that you may want to request a supervisor or a lawyer.  

It is important to understand that LEOSA does not convey any powers of arrest and does not apply to restricted areas such as airports at or beyond the TSA checkpoint, jails, courthouses, military bases, etc. It also does not negate trespass laws. If someone decides not to allow you to carry a gun on their property, that is their right. Of course, if they don’t know, it may only be a rule you are breaking and not a law. Sporting events and theme parks are examples where some property owners may foolishly enforce rules on LEOSA carriers that were meant for civilian gun carriers. State and local laws vary on restrictions regarding pistol permits for civilians. 

LEOSA has been amended twice to clarify the intent of Congress to make LEOs and society safer by allowing and encouraging trained guardians to carry tools to protect themselves and others from criminal violence. New case law will define it more precisely. There are still some issues that need to be addressed, such as standardizing credentials and forcing agencies to issue them. Personally, I’d like to see LEOSA extended to airplanes. With just a bit of extra training, we could eliminate most of the expensive sky marshals while improving security with a huge untraceable cadre of unpaid LEOSA carriers. In pre 9/11 days, LEOs routinely flew armed. The procedure was for the airline gate agent to introduce you to the head flight attendant, pilot, and any other armed passengers. It was simple, safe and effective. As with most laws, it is important to understand the spirit of the law rather than focus on the letter when applying it to a given situation. Common sense, unfortunately, is not so common. Take care of yourself and stay safe.

Dave Bryant

Dave Bryant

Dave Bryant is a retired police officer with over 30 years of experience with several agencies. He is an FDLE and NRA law enforcement instructor and active member of IALEFI. He has a private business as a polygraph examiner in Tampa, Florida. He can be reached at SenseiDave@msn.com.

View articles by Dave Bryant

As seen in the February 2024 issue of American Police Beat magazine.
Don’t miss out on another issue today! Click below:

SUBSCRIBE TODAY!

Categories: Policy

Primary Sidebar

Recent Articles

  • National Law Enforcement Museum hosts inaugural Pathways in Criminal Justice Career Fair Series event
  • A modern field guide to understanding research in policing
  • Tattoos can be self-inflicted handicaps
  • The Pentagon
  • Threshold neuroscience
  • The war on drugs is evolving
  • Integrated virtual reality training
  • Drug policy and enforcement
  • Who’s watching the watchmen?
  • Crime and punishment (or lack thereof) in Seattle

Footer

Our Mission
To serve as a trusted voice of the nation’s law enforcement community, providing informative, entertaining and inspiring content on interesting and engaging topics affecting peace officers today.

Contact us: info@apbweb.com | (800) 234-0056.

  • Facebook
  • Instagram
  • Twitter

Categories

  • Editor’s Picks
  • On the Job
  • Labor
  • Tech
  • Training
  • Policy
  • Health/Wellness
  • Community
  • Offbeat
  • We Remember
  • Jobs and Careers
  • Events

Editor’s Picks

Law enforcement’s missing weapon

Law enforcement’s missing weapon

January 28, 2026

Has law enforcement changed?

Has law enforcement changed?

January 26, 2026

Policing the police

Policing the police

January 23, 2026

Fit for duty

Fit for duty

January 19, 2026

Policies | Consent Preferences | Copyright © 2026 APB Media, LLC | Website design, development and maintenance by 911MEDIA

Open

Subscribe

Close

Receive the latest news and updates from American Police Beat directly to your inbox!

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.