• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer
  • Home
  • About
  • The Magazine
  • Events
  • Partners
  • Products
  • Contact
  • Jobs and Careers
  • Advertise
  • Facebook
  • Instagram
  • Twitter
  • Subscribe
American Police Beat

American Police Beat Magazine

Law Enforcement Publication

  • Home
  • Leadership
    • Hardcore experts should not be decision-makers!
      Law enforcement’s missing weapon
      Leadership with heart
      Smart power
      Can your staff keep pace with your leadership goals?
  • Topics
    • Leadership
      • Hardcore experts should not be decision-makers!
        Law enforcement’s missing weapon
        Leadership with heart
        Smart power
        Can your staff keep pace with your leadership goals?
    • Editor’s Picks
      • Effective in-service training
        Smart power
        Is anyone listening?
        A Christmas loss
        Mental health checks … in the training room?
    • On the Job
      • Has law enforcement changed?
        SROs in action
        Stay in your lane
        Santa’s helpers
        The power of calm-edy
    • Labor
      • Labor leadership out in the field
        When you are falsely accused
        Is anyone listening?
        The power of mediation
        Differentiation in police recruitment
    • Tech
      • Gear that moves with you
        A new breed of cop car
        The future of patrol is here
        New York governor highlights $24 million investment to modernize law...
        Cutting-edge police technology
    • Training
      • Hit the pause button
        Effective in-service training
        The untrained trainer
        The vision behind precision
        Mentorship: Ensuring future success
    • Policy
      • Policing the police
        Utah repeals ban on collective bargaining
        Violence against officers is on the rise
        New Mexico’s Law Enforcement Retention Fund keeps experienced,...
        The phenomenon of trauma bonding in law enforcement
    • Health/Wellness
      • Fit for duty
        Maintain your mental armor
        Beyond crisis response
        Mental health checks … in the training room?
        Surviving and thriving in retirement
    • Community
      • Shop with a Cop
        Community engagement: What is it moving forward?
        Contradictory crossroads
        Back-to-school season brings out police support nationwide
        A bold idea for reducing homelessness in America
    • Offbeat
      • An unexpected burglar
        Police humor only a cop would understand
        Not eggzactly a perfect heist
        Pizza … with a side of alligator?
        Wisconsin man charged with impersonating Border Patrol agent twice in...
    • We Remember
      • A nation propelled to war, lives changed forever
        A Christmas loss
        York County ambush leaves three officers dead, others critically...
        Honoring the Fallen Heroes of 9/11
        Team Romeo
    • HOT Mail
      • The War on Cops Continues Unabated
  • On the Job
    • Has law enforcement changed?
      SROs in action
      Stay in your lane
      Santa’s helpers
      The power of calm-edy
  • Labor
    • Labor leadership out in the field
      When you are falsely accused
      Is anyone listening?
      The power of mediation
      Differentiation in police recruitment
  • Tech
    • Gear that moves with you
      A new breed of cop car
      The future of patrol is here
      New York governor highlights $24 million investment to modernize law...
      Cutting-edge police technology
  • Training
    • Hit the pause button
      Effective in-service training
      The untrained trainer
      The vision behind precision
      Mentorship: Ensuring future success
  • Policy
    • Policing the police
      Utah repeals ban on collective bargaining
      Violence against officers is on the rise
      New Mexico’s Law Enforcement Retention Fund keeps experienced,...
      The phenomenon of trauma bonding in law enforcement
  • Health/Wellness
    • Fit for duty
      Maintain your mental armor
      Beyond crisis response
      Mental health checks … in the training room?
      Surviving and thriving in retirement
  • Community
    • Shop with a Cop
      Community engagement: What is it moving forward?
      Contradictory crossroads
      Back-to-school season brings out police support nationwide
      A bold idea for reducing homelessness in America
  • Offbeat
    • An unexpected burglar
      Police humor only a cop would understand
      Not eggzactly a perfect heist
      Pizza … with a side of alligator?
      Wisconsin man charged with impersonating Border Patrol agent twice in...
  • We Remember
    • A nation propelled to war, lives changed forever
      A Christmas loss
      York County ambush leaves three officers dead, others critically...
      Honoring the Fallen Heroes of 9/11
      Team Romeo
  • HOT Mail
    • The War on Cops Continues Unabated
  • About
  • The Magazine
  • Events
  • Partners
  • Products
  • Contact
  • Jobs and Careers
  • Advertise
  • Subscribe
Search

Tech

Google slaps price tag on data for LE

APB Team Published March 12, 2020 @ 1:26 pm PDT

iStock.com/dusanpetkovic

 

In the online age, it has become increasingly necessary for law enforcement agencies to turn to companies like Google to retrieve data about suspects — like emails, online search queries and location tracking information. But with requests rising, Google recently began charging law enforcement for that kind of data.

The new fees range from $45 for a subpoena to $60 for a wiretap and $245 for a search warrant, according to a notice sent to law enforcement officials that was reviewed by the New York Times. There will be separate fees for other legal requests.

A Google spokesman said these fees were introduced in order to help offset the costs of complying with warrants and subpoenas, and federal law does allow companies to charge the government such fees. However, the tech giant’s decision marks a significant change in how it deals with these kinds of requests.

Most tech companies have chosen not to charge government and law enforcement agencies, in part because they haven’t wanted to seem like they’re seeking a profit from legal searches. It also can be difficult to track and enforce such charges because of the sheer number of requests that a company like Google has to deal with. For reference, in the first half of 2019, Google received more than 75,000 requests for data on nearly 165,000 accounts worldwide, and approximately a third of those requests came from the United States.

Some privacy experts have recommended that companies start charging fees in an effort to cut down such requests. They believe that reducing the number of requests will in turn limit the overall surveillance citizens are under.

Al Gidari, a lawyer who has represented Google and other technology and telecom companies, told the New York Times that these fees could recover some of the costs that are required to fill such a huge number of requests. He added that requests have gotten more complicated over time as tech companies have compiled more data and law enforcement has gotten more tech savvy.

“None of the services were designed with exfiltrating data for law enforcement in mind,” he said. “The actual costs of doing wiretaps and responding to search warrants is high, and when you pass those costs on to the government, it deters from excessive surveillance.”

Google released a report that revealed an increase of more than 50% in the number of search warrants it received in the first half of 2019 compared to the same time frame a year earlier. The number of subpoenas also rose approximately 15%. In the first half of last year, Google received almost 13,000 subpoenas and more than 10,000 search warrants from American law enforcement.

There also will be cases in which Google does not charge these new fees. A company spokesperson said they will not ask for reimbursement in life-threatening emergencies or cases involving investigations of child safety.

Google’s fees are so new and the number of data requests is so vast that it’s difficult to know the full impact of this policy. Only time will tell.

As seen in the March 2020 issue of American Police Beat magazine.
Don’t miss out on another issue today! Click below:

SUBSCRIBE TODAY!

Categories: Tech

Primary Sidebar

Recent Articles

  • National Law Enforcement Officers Memorial Fund announces December 2025 Officers of the Month
  • Hardcore experts should not be decision-makers!
  • Law enforcement’s missing weapon
  • Has law enforcement changed?
  • Leadership with heart
  • SROs in action
  • Policing the police
  • Labor leadership out in the field
  • Hit the pause button
  • A nation propelled to war, lives changed forever

Footer

Our Mission
To serve as a trusted voice of the nation’s law enforcement community, providing informative, entertaining and inspiring content on interesting and engaging topics affecting peace officers today.

Contact us: info@apbweb.com | (800) 234-0056.

  • Facebook
  • Instagram
  • Twitter

Categories

  • Editor’s Picks
  • On the Job
  • Labor
  • Tech
  • Training
  • Policy
  • Health/Wellness
  • Community
  • Offbeat
  • We Remember
  • Jobs and Careers
  • Events

Editor’s Picks

Effective in-service training

Effective in-service training

January 06, 2026

Smart power

Smart power

December 25, 2025

Is anyone listening?

Is anyone listening?

December 19, 2025

A Christmas loss

A Christmas loss

December 10, 2025

Policies | Consent Preferences | Copyright © 2026 APB Media, LLC | Website design, development and maintenance by 911MEDIA

Open

Subscribe

Close

Receive the latest news and updates from American Police Beat directly to your inbox!

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.