• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer
  • Home
  • About
  • The Magazine
  • Partners
  • Products
  • Advertise
  • Contact
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Instagram
  • Subscribe to the Magazine
American Police Beat

American Police Beat Magazine

Law Enforcement Publication

  • Home
  • Featured
    • K-9 lifesaver
      Cop Hobbies: Geocaching
      From cop to dad
      Getting some shut-eye
      Police technology: Why so far behind?
  • Topics
    • On the Job
      • The gatekeepers of school safety
        Reality bites
        Over two decades of catching online predators
        Party bus bust
        If you’re not telling your story on social media, who is?
    • Labor
      • NYPD disciplinary records made public
        Raising the bar
        Retirements up, recruiting down
        Maryland considers repealing officers’ bill of rights
        The fight for diversity
    • Tech
      • Data-driven investigations
        Police technology: Why so far behind?
        Charlotte-Mecklenburg police use key technology to battle crime wave
        Denver police gun detection technology pays off
        Reliable sources
    • Training
      • LPVO: The Goldilocks of AR optics
        Chicago PD introduces real-life situation training
        Reset in recoil: Working with your gun, not against it
        K-9 lifesaver
        South Carolina technical colleges looking to offer law enforcement...
    • Policy
      • Minneapolis decides to “refund” police following crime increase
        NYPD disciplinary records made public
        Pennsylvania top court decides on warrantless vehicle searches
        Capitol confusion
        Biden executive order bans police access to high-tech military...
    • Health/Wellness
      • Capitol riot suicides shine light on police mental health struggles
        So much for those New Year’s resolutions, eh?
        Save jobs and lives
        Everyday work trauma and your brain
        Getting some shut-eye
    • Community
      • Life-changing gifts
        Honoring Nashville’s heroes
        From cop to dad
        South Carolina technical colleges looking to offer law enforcement...
        Record carjackings across the country
    • Humor
      • The force is strong with this one
        Dude, where’s my car?
        Dressed to impress
        How to retire angry
        Ousted police chief makes his departure brief — literally
    • We Remember
      • Slain Capitol Police officer honored
        A thread of courage and love
        COVID-19 “very likely” to kill more cops than 9/11
        Always honored, never forgotten
        More space needed at National Memorial
  • On the Job
    • The gatekeepers of school safety
      Reality bites
      Over two decades of catching online predators
      Party bus bust
      If you’re not telling your story on social media, who is?
  • Labor
    • NYPD disciplinary records made public
      Raising the bar
      Retirements up, recruiting down
      Maryland considers repealing officers’ bill of rights
      The fight for diversity
  • Tech
    • Data-driven investigations
      Police technology: Why so far behind?
      Charlotte-Mecklenburg police use key technology to battle crime wave
      Denver police gun detection technology pays off
      Reliable sources
  • Training
    • LPVO: The Goldilocks of AR optics
      Chicago PD introduces real-life situation training
      Reset in recoil: Working with your gun, not against it
      K-9 lifesaver
      South Carolina technical colleges looking to offer law enforcement...
  • Policy
    • Minneapolis decides to “refund” police following crime increase
      NYPD disciplinary records made public
      Pennsylvania top court decides on warrantless vehicle searches
      Capitol confusion
      Biden executive order bans police access to high-tech military...
  • Health/Wellness
    • Capitol riot suicides shine light on police mental health struggles
      So much for those New Year’s resolutions, eh?
      Save jobs and lives
      Everyday work trauma and your brain
      Getting some shut-eye
  • Community
    • Life-changing gifts
      Honoring Nashville’s heroes
      From cop to dad
      South Carolina technical colleges looking to offer law enforcement...
      Record carjackings across the country
  • Humor
    • The force is strong with this one
      Dude, where’s my car?
      Dressed to impress
      How to retire angry
      Ousted police chief makes his departure brief — literally
  • We Remember
    • Slain Capitol Police officer honored
      A thread of courage and love
      COVID-19 “very likely” to kill more cops than 9/11
      Always honored, never forgotten
      More space needed at National Memorial
  • Jobs and Careers
  • About
  • The Magazine
  • Partners
  • Products
  • Advertise
  • Contact
Search

Community

The bounds of legal authority during crisis

Opinion/Editorial

David T. Snively Published May 22, 2020 @ 1:00 pm PDT

iStock.com/Juanmonino

In the face of a global viral pandemic believed to be spread through close personal contact, hosting a gathering of 500 people or more could be called foolish, reckless, dangerous and — in Florida at least — it is, for now, called illegal. On March 29, Pastor Rodney Howard-Browne held Sunday services at The River at Tampa Bay Church, drawing hundreds of people inside.1 By Monday morning, a warrant had been issued for his arrest, charging unlawful assembly and violation of a public health emergency order. The warrant was announced at a press conference led by Hillsborough County Sheriff Chad Chronister and State Attorney Andrew Warren. In their announcement, Warren said, “I think it’s unfortunate that the pastor here is hiding behind the First Amendment.”2

The purpose of this article is not to suggest that gathering en masse is a reasonable act, especially given the dangers of COVID-19; nor do I intend to debate the well-intent of a public heath declaration aimed at stifling its spread. But, where government action carries even the appearance of infringing upon Constitutional protections, law enforcement officers and agency administrators are well served to think critically about the implications attached to their actions long before they are called to implement them. Similarly, particularly when viewed within the post-Ferguson efforts to re-legitimize American policing and advance community trust, the use of police authority to enforce orders about which the public are widely skeptical should be approached with the utmost caution. This is especially true given the conditions necessary for an officer to enjoy qualified immunity — that the official’s conduct does not violate clearly established statutory or constitutional rights of which a reasonable officer would have known.3

In the present example, the potential ramifications of (ostensibly) prohibiting the free exercise of religion and prohibiting an otherwise peaceful assembly — both separately well-established as protected by the First Amendment to the Constitution — should be of tremendous concern to officers at every level of law enforcement.

There is an inherent complexity to utilizing law enforcement officers for the enforcement of “rules” other than explicitly criminal matters. This is with great reason; certainly, any number of articles could be recalled suggesting that the police are overinvolved in attempts to solve an array of societal ills for which they were not intended. The move to criminalize a particular behavior, however noble, brings with it the armed agents of the government tasked with enforcing those prohibitions. This task should thusly never be taken lightly.

Critical to conceptualizing and implementing the law enforcement response to an emergency is a recognition that the suspension of legal review is nearly always temporary. Thus, while a seemingly practical action may be unchallenged in the moment it is undertaken, judicial review is a potential eventuality, even if untimely. Perhaps significantly, as time passes between the emergency and that legal review, the reasonableness of a particular act may fade in the eyes of the reviewer. It is also important to consider that, while states and municipalities are empowered to enact laws and ordinances to establish and enforce laws, especially those protecting the welfare, safety and health of the public, there is nearly no mechanism for preventing the implementation of an unconstitutional law. Assessing the constitutionality of a statute is a task delegated to the judicial branch, and such, a review is typically triggered only by a party seeking redress. Consider, for example: The Official Code of Georgia Annotated §40-1-4 still prohibits knowingly affixing to a motor vehicle any sticker containing profane or lewd words describing “sexual acts, excretory functions, or parts of the human body.”4 This, despite a 1991 Georgia Supreme Court decision which found the statute was unconstitutional and violated both the First and 14th Amendments to the Constitution.5 Officers in every state could similarly locate statutory prohibitions, which are clearly contradicted by the Constitution and by various courts’ interpretations thereof. Thus, officers and administrators are reminded that the mere existence of a statute is not at all correlated with its constitutionality.

This potential conflict between legality and constitutionality is a particularly relevant consideration for agency executives. Chiefs and sheriffs should not be merely carrying out emergency ordinances; they should be an integral part of formulating them. Similarly, police officers at all levels of an agency should be empowered to openly discuss the moral and legal ramifications of a particular ordinance or policy, and supervisors should have clear lines of authority along which they can make recommendations. Significant deliberation must be given to the question of whether specific acts should be criminalized. Because enforcement of those statutes is an eventuality, that decision should center on a clear determination that the police are both necessary and appropriate enforcers of the desired outcome. It is insufficient and imprudent to presume that the threat of legal action, when made by a police officer, will be any more beneficial to achieving a particular outcome than an order given by some other public official.

Finally, procedural methods for the implementation of specific authorities and protocols should be developed well before they are needed. Consider in the present context: was arresting Pastor Howard-Browne and introducing him into a jail facility after he was in close contact with hundreds of other people one day earlier the most prudent course of action? Would a citation or summons have been more appropriate? These sorts of procedural preparations are key to efficiently achieving intended outcomes and to defending the methods by which they were accomplished.

History has not been kind to agency leaders, politicians or even to presidents who stepped outside the constitutionally prescribed mechanisms in an attempt to mitigate even the direst crises. But emergency response is the essence of law enforcement, and law enforcement leaders are among the best suited to craft policies, procedures and even statutes to respond to them in an appropriate — and legal — manner. This is a call for cops to do what we do best: lead and protect.


1 Fox 13 News. (2020, March 30). Tampa megachurch pastor arrested after leading packed services despite ‘safer-at-home’ orders. https://www.fox13news.com/news/tampa-megachurch-pastor-arrested-after-leading-packed-services-despite-safer-at-home-orders
2 Ibid.
3 White v. Pauly, 580 U.S. ___ (2017)
4 O.C.G.A § 40-1-4 (2018).
5 Cunningham v. State, 260 Ga. 827 (1991).

As seen in the May 2020 issue of American Police Beat magazine.
Don’t miss out on another issue today! Click below:

SUBSCRIBE TODAY!

Categories: Community, Bullhorn

Primary Sidebar

Recent Articles

  • The gatekeepers of school safety
  • Capitol riot suicides shine light on police mental health struggles
  • Minneapolis decides to “refund” police following crime increase
  • Reality bites
  • Over two decades of catching online predators
  • Party bus bust
  • If you’re not telling your story on social media, who is?
  • Virtual currency investigations
  • So much for those New Year’s resolutions, eh?
  • Save jobs and lives
Advertise with APB

Footer

Our Mission
To serve as a trusted voice of the nation’s law enforcement community, providing informative, entertaining and inspiring content on interesting and engaging topics affecting peace officers today.

Contact us: info@apbweb.com

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Instagram

Categories

  • Featured
  • On the Job
  • Labor
  • Tech
  • Training
  • Policy
  • Health/Wellness
  • Community
  • Humor
  • We Remember
  • Jobs and Careers

Editor’s Picks

Ass-kissing, favoritism, oh my!

Ass-kissing, favoritism, oh my!

January 28, 2021

This K-9 is a gym rat at heart!

This K-9 is a gym rat at heart!

January 25, 2021

A thread of courage and love

A thread of courage and love

January 20, 2021

The job doesn’t love you back

The job doesn’t love you back

December 28, 2020

Privacy Policy | Copyright © 2021 American Police Beat, Inc. | Website design, development and maintenance by 911MEDIA

Open

Subscribe

Close
Receive the latest news and updates from American Police Beat directly to your inbox!
  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.