• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer
  • Home
  • About
  • The Magazine
  • Events
  • Partners
  • Products
  • Contact
  • Jobs and Careers
  • Advertise
  • Facebook
  • Instagram
  • Twitter
  • Subscribe
American Police Beat

American Police Beat Magazine

Law Enforcement Publication

  • Home
  • Leadership
    • Why you should lead from 30,000 feet
      Public perception and trust
      When performance reviews are a waste of time
      Taking a page from Toyota’s playbook
      Tattoos can be self-inflicted handicaps
  • Topics
    • Leadership
      • Why you should lead from 30,000 feet
        Public perception and trust
        When performance reviews are a waste of time
        Taking a page from Toyota’s playbook
        Tattoos can be self-inflicted handicaps
    • Editor’s Picks
      • Liability challenges in contemporary policing
        When performance reviews are a waste of time
        Proactive wellness visits
        Taking a page from Toyota’s playbook
        Law enforcement’s missing weapon
    • On the Job
      • Right place, right time — again
        Some good news on crime
        Mom-to-be named Cop of the Year
        Fatherly instincts save boy from icy water
        More than a call for service
    • Labor
      • Labor release under fire
        Who’s watching the watchmen?
        Crime and punishment (or lack thereof) in Seattle
        Labor leadership out in the field
        When you are falsely accused
    • Tech
      • A modern field guide to understanding research in policing
        Gear that moves with you
        A new breed of cop car
        The future of patrol is here
        New York governor highlights $24 million investment to modernize law...
    • Training
      • Navigating danger
        Critical thinking in police training
        Threshold neuroscience
        Integrated virtual reality training
        Hit the pause button
    • Policy
      • Try racing without wheels
        Law enforcement accreditation: Why it matters
        Liability challenges in contemporary policing
        The war on drugs is evolving
        Drug policy and enforcement
    • Health/Wellness
      • Nervous system regulation
        The nature of the job
        Promoting organizational wellness
        Telling cops to get more sleep isn’t working
        Proactive wellness visits
    • Community
      • Shop with a Cop
        Community engagement: What is it moving forward?
        Contradictory crossroads
        Back-to-school season brings out police support nationwide
        A bold idea for reducing homelessness in America
    • Offbeat
      • An unexpected burglar
        Police humor only a cop would understand
        Not eggzactly a perfect heist
        Pizza … with a side of alligator?
        Wisconsin man charged with impersonating Border Patrol agent twice in...
    • We Remember
      • Forty heroes: United Airlines Flight 93
        The Pentagon
        A nation propelled to war, lives changed forever
        A Christmas loss
        York County ambush leaves three officers dead, others critically...
    • HOT Mail
      • The War on Cops Continues Unabated
  • On the Job
    • Right place, right time — again
      Some good news on crime
      Mom-to-be named Cop of the Year
      Fatherly instincts save boy from icy water
      More than a call for service
  • Labor
    • Labor release under fire
      Who’s watching the watchmen?
      Crime and punishment (or lack thereof) in Seattle
      Labor leadership out in the field
      When you are falsely accused
  • Tech
    • A modern field guide to understanding research in policing
      Gear that moves with you
      A new breed of cop car
      The future of patrol is here
      New York governor highlights $24 million investment to modernize law...
  • Training
    • Navigating danger
      Critical thinking in police training
      Threshold neuroscience
      Integrated virtual reality training
      Hit the pause button
  • Policy
    • Try racing without wheels
      Law enforcement accreditation: Why it matters
      Liability challenges in contemporary policing
      The war on drugs is evolving
      Drug policy and enforcement
  • Health/Wellness
    • Nervous system regulation
      The nature of the job
      Promoting organizational wellness
      Telling cops to get more sleep isn’t working
      Proactive wellness visits
  • Community
    • Shop with a Cop
      Community engagement: What is it moving forward?
      Contradictory crossroads
      Back-to-school season brings out police support nationwide
      A bold idea for reducing homelessness in America
  • Offbeat
    • An unexpected burglar
      Police humor only a cop would understand
      Not eggzactly a perfect heist
      Pizza … with a side of alligator?
      Wisconsin man charged with impersonating Border Patrol agent twice in...
  • We Remember
    • Forty heroes: United Airlines Flight 93
      The Pentagon
      A nation propelled to war, lives changed forever
      A Christmas loss
      York County ambush leaves three officers dead, others critically...
  • HOT Mail
    • The War on Cops Continues Unabated
  • About
  • The Magazine
  • Events
  • Partners
  • Products
  • Contact
  • Jobs and Careers
  • Advertise
  • Subscribe
Search

Policy

New Colorado bill could limit deadly force to “last resort” only

APB Team Published April 15, 2021 @ 1:00 pm PDT

iStock.com/Amy Sparwasser

A new bill proposed in the Colorado house aims to raise the bar for law enforcement’s use of deadly force.

According to the Colorado Sun, House Bill 1250 stipulates that law enforcement officers use deadly force only as a “last resort” and after having “exhausted all reasonable de-escalation tactics and techniques.”

The bill, as part of a broader set of police accountability legislation, would also limit officers’ use of deadly force to situations where they or the public face a proportional danger, and prohibits deadly force against someone who is a danger only to themselves.

The bill builds on previous legislation passed in 2020 following the death of George Floyd that eliminated the “reasonable-officer” standard for the use of deadly force, instead requiring officers to face an “imminent threat” first.

The Colorado Sun reported that Senate Bill 217 raised initially raised the bar for when officers could use deadly force to situations where they face an imminent threat, which overruled the previous standard that allowed officers to use deadly force if they reasonably judged that their lives or the lives of their colleagues were in danger.

Primary sponsor of the bill, Rep. Leslie Herod said the definition of last resort is “discretionary,” and requires officers to have sufficient justification for their actions.

“This is trying to obligate law enforcement to use a lot of other measures before it goes to the use of deadly force,” she said.

The Colorado Association of Chiefs of Police were “surprised” by the bill, especially after they had just accommodated to Senate Bill 217.

Spokeswoman for the association Amy Faircloth said, “Law enforcement recently completed training on the new use-of-force standards put in place by Senate Bill 217. We were surprised to learn of the use-of-force changes in House Bill 1250. We will comment further once we have had a chance to review the bill.”

Republican Senator and former Weld County sheriff John Cooke opposed the bill, citing the broad language of its “last-resort” clause.

“That’s horrible. That’s so broad. I don’t know how anybody can live by that standard,” he said.

Cooke argued that officers are often forced to make split-second judgments when reacting to potentially deadly situations, and a bill that requires officers to second-guess themselves is unreasonable. He argued further that the bill is a “trap” and “is going to cause a lot of uncertainty.”

House Bill 1250, referred to by Herod as a “clean-up bill,” contains several other provisions, such as ending qualified immunity for Colorado State Patrol troopers (Bill 217 ended it for local law enforcement), revoking funding for agencies that don’t comply or attempt to shield officers from this ruling by refusing to acknowledge that officers acted in bad faith, as well as including specific training for officers who use force and revoking certification from officers who seriously hurt or kill someone.

House Bill 1250 has not been scheduled for a committee hearing yet.

Categories: Policy

Primary Sidebar

Recent Articles

  • NLEOMF announces February 2026 Officers of the Month
  • Fallen law enforcement officers from across the country to be honored during 38th Annual Candlelight Vigil on May 13 in Washington, D.C.
  • Nervous system regulation
  • Navigating danger
  • The nature of the job
  • Forty heroes: United Airlines Flight 93
  • Why you should lead from 30,000 feet
  • Promoting organizational wellness
  • Critical thinking in police training
  • Public perception and trust

Footer

Our Mission
To serve as a trusted voice of the nation’s law enforcement community, providing informative, entertaining and inspiring content on interesting and engaging topics affecting peace officers today.

Contact us: info@apbweb.com | (800) 234-0056.

  • Facebook
  • Instagram
  • Twitter

Categories

  • Editor’s Picks
  • On the Job
  • Labor
  • Tech
  • Training
  • Policy
  • Health/Wellness
  • Community
  • Offbeat
  • We Remember
  • Jobs and Careers
  • Events

Editor’s Picks

Liability challenges in contemporary policing

Liability challenges in contemporary policing

February 27, 2026

When performance reviews are a waste of time

When performance reviews are a waste of time

February 26, 2026

Proactive wellness visits

Proactive wellness visits

February 25, 2026

Taking a page from Toyota’s playbook

Taking a page from Toyota’s playbook

February 23, 2026

Policies | Consent Preferences | Copyright © 2026 APB Media, LLC | Website design, development and maintenance by 911MEDIA

Open

Subscribe

Close

Receive the latest news and updates from American Police Beat directly to your inbox!

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.