• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer
  • Home
  • About
  • The Magazine
  • Events
  • Partners
  • Products
  • Contact
  • Jobs and Careers
  • Advertise
  • Facebook
  • Instagram
  • Twitter
  • Subscribe
American Police Beat

American Police Beat Magazine

Law Enforcement Publication

  • Home
  • Leadership
    • Understanding the boundaries of professional relationships with the...
      Why you should lead from 30,000 feet
      Public perception and trust
      When performance reviews are a waste of time
      Taking a page from Toyota’s playbook
  • Topics
    • Leadership
      • Understanding the boundaries of professional relationships with the...
        Why you should lead from 30,000 feet
        Public perception and trust
        When performance reviews are a waste of time
        Taking a page from Toyota’s playbook
    • Editor’s Picks
      • Let’s get moving!
        Heroes of the World Trade Center
        The Promise Gap
        Corruption, collusion and impunity
        Liability challenges in contemporary policing
    • On the Job
      • Frankpledge to forensics: A brief history of law enforcement
        Villains and heroes in the Big Apple
        Right place, right time — again
        Some good news on crime
        Mom-to-be named Cop of the Year
    • Labor
      • The Promise Gap
        Cut the cops, save a dollar?
        Labor release under fire
        Who’s watching the watchmen?
        Crime and punishment (or lack thereof) in Seattle
    • Tech
      • New Mexico license plate readers save lives, lead to “precise...
        A modern field guide to understanding research in policing
        Gear that moves with you
        A new breed of cop car
        The future of patrol is here
    • Training
      • Pushback as a training signal
        Let’s get moving!
        The five minutes before the ambulance
        Navigating danger
        Critical thinking in police training
    • Policy
      • Corruption, collusion and impunity
        E-bikes spark public safety concerns
        Try racing without wheels
        Law enforcement accreditation: Why it matters
        Liability challenges in contemporary policing
    • Health/Wellness
      • Addressing stress, vicarious trauma and burnout
        Nervous system regulation
        The nature of the job
        Promoting organizational wellness
        Telling cops to get more sleep isn’t working
    • Community
      • Improving autism awareness
        Shop with a Cop
        Community engagement: What is it moving forward?
        Contradictory crossroads
        Back-to-school season brings out police support nationwide
    • Offbeat
      • An unexpected burglar
        Police humor only a cop would understand
        Not eggzactly a perfect heist
        Pizza … with a side of alligator?
        Wisconsin man charged with impersonating Border Patrol agent twice in...
    • We Remember
      • Heroes of the World Trade Center
        Forty heroes: United Airlines Flight 93
        The Pentagon
        A nation propelled to war, lives changed forever
        A Christmas loss
    • HOT Mail
      • The War on Cops Continues Unabated
  • On the Job
    • Frankpledge to forensics: A brief history of law enforcement
      Villains and heroes in the Big Apple
      Right place, right time — again
      Some good news on crime
      Mom-to-be named Cop of the Year
  • Labor
    • The Promise Gap
      Cut the cops, save a dollar?
      Labor release under fire
      Who’s watching the watchmen?
      Crime and punishment (or lack thereof) in Seattle
  • Tech
    • New Mexico license plate readers save lives, lead to “precise...
      A modern field guide to understanding research in policing
      Gear that moves with you
      A new breed of cop car
      The future of patrol is here
  • Training
    • Pushback as a training signal
      Let’s get moving!
      The five minutes before the ambulance
      Navigating danger
      Critical thinking in police training
  • Policy
    • Corruption, collusion and impunity
      E-bikes spark public safety concerns
      Try racing without wheels
      Law enforcement accreditation: Why it matters
      Liability challenges in contemporary policing
  • Health/Wellness
    • Addressing stress, vicarious trauma and burnout
      Nervous system regulation
      The nature of the job
      Promoting organizational wellness
      Telling cops to get more sleep isn’t working
  • Community
    • Improving autism awareness
      Shop with a Cop
      Community engagement: What is it moving forward?
      Contradictory crossroads
      Back-to-school season brings out police support nationwide
  • Offbeat
    • An unexpected burglar
      Police humor only a cop would understand
      Not eggzactly a perfect heist
      Pizza … with a side of alligator?
      Wisconsin man charged with impersonating Border Patrol agent twice in...
  • We Remember
    • Heroes of the World Trade Center
      Forty heroes: United Airlines Flight 93
      The Pentagon
      A nation propelled to war, lives changed forever
      A Christmas loss
  • HOT Mail
    • The War on Cops Continues Unabated
  • About
  • The Magazine
  • Events
  • Partners
  • Products
  • Contact
  • Jobs and Careers
  • Advertise
  • Subscribe
Search

Policy

Portland judge restricts use of less-lethal launchers at protests

APB Team Published March 28, 2021 @ 12:00 pm PDT

iStock.com/drakuliren

Portland police’s Rapid Response Team was faced with tighter restrictions after a federal judge limited their use of crowd-control launchers until further training is given to officers.

U.S. District Judge Marco Hernandez’s sanctions came as a result of a lawsuit by nonprofit “Don’t Shoot Portland,” a Black-led advocacy group for “social and racial justice.”

According to The Oregonian, the lawsuit sought to ban on-impact munitions, as well as to remove officers from protest duty if they violated the ban.

Hernandez’s sanctions included restrictions on firing FN303 riot guns and 40mm less-lethal launchers, as well as using pepper spray against protestors engaged in passive resistance, rather than banning the weapons outright. It also ordered the Portland Police Bureau to investigate allegations that officer Brent Taylor violated the court order by firing less-lethal munitions during a protest on June 30.

The city reported in January that Taylor had been removed from protest duty while the police internal affairs division investigated the allegations.

Attorney Juan Chavez who represented the nonprofit said of the trial, “We’re gratified that the Court has taken the City to task after months of unconstitutional conduct. We hope that the City sees this as an opportunity to move towards the kind of transformational change that Portlanders have been demanding for years. We also recognize that this ruling required a lot of brave Portlanders to step forward and hold their City to account in an open court of law…it took the voices of thousands in the streets to bring about a temporary end to this kind of wanton police violence. Black lives matter.”

The court order also ruled that further training be given to officers on protest control. The judge’s order stipulates that all Rapid Response Team grenadiers and supervisors receive 9 hours of new training during which the limitations on use of force are reviewed and prior incidents that violated the court order are also reviewed.

It also stipulated that grenadiers receive training every six months, and that the Police Bureau must distribute copies of the court order to officers, who must certify that they have read it.

The city will also give an additional three hours of training to all officers regarding the use of force at protests, including reviews of video footage from prior protests, to ensure that officers understand how to apply the use-of-force policy. The training will explicitly define “passive resistance,” “physical resistance” and “active aggression.”

In the meantime, the court order will ban police from using riot guns and less-lethal launchers until the city can certify that police have “demonstrated an understanding” of the court’s orders and that they can deal with passive resistance without unnecessary force.

Categories: Policy

Primary Sidebar

Recent Articles

  • Frankpledge to forensics: A brief history of law enforcement
  • Pushback as a training signal
  • Let’s get moving!
  • Heroes of the World Trade Center
  • The Promise Gap
  • Corruption, collusion and impunity
  • The five minutes before the ambulance
  • New Mexico license plate readers save lives, lead to “precise policing”
  • Addressing stress, vicarious trauma and burnout
  • Understanding the boundaries of professional relationships with the boss

Footer

Our Mission
To serve as a trusted voice of the nation’s law enforcement community, providing informative, entertaining and inspiring content on interesting and engaging topics affecting peace officers today.

Contact us: info@apbweb.com | (800) 234-0056.

  • Facebook
  • Instagram
  • Twitter

Categories

  • Editor’s Picks
  • On the Job
  • Labor
  • Tech
  • Training
  • Policy
  • Health/Wellness
  • Community
  • Offbeat
  • We Remember
  • Jobs and Careers
  • Events

Editor’s Picks

Let’s get moving!

Let’s get moving!

April 27, 2026

Heroes of the World Trade Center

Heroes of the World Trade Center

April 24, 2026

The Promise Gap

The Promise Gap

April 22, 2026

Corruption, collusion and impunity

Corruption, collusion and impunity

April 21, 2026

Policies | Consent Preferences | Copyright © 2026 APB Media, LLC | Website design, development and maintenance by 911MEDIA

Open

Subscribe

Close

Receive the latest news and updates from American Police Beat directly to your inbox!

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.