• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer
  • Home
  • About
  • The Magazine
  • Events
  • Partners
  • Products
  • Contact
  • Jobs and Careers
  • Advertise
  • Facebook
  • Instagram
  • Twitter
  • Subscribe
American Police Beat

American Police Beat Magazine

Law Enforcement Publication

  • Home
  • Leadership
    • Go that extra mile with a smile
      Improving the promotional process for supervisors
      Developing an ethics-centered police department
      Leadership without the family factor is not leadership
      Prozac saved my career, and possibly my life
  • Topics
    • Leadership
      • Go that extra mile with a smile
        Improving the promotional process for supervisors
        Developing an ethics-centered police department
        Leadership without the family factor is not leadership
        Prozac saved my career, and possibly my life
    • Editor’s Picks
      • Getting ahead of the story
        A state in crisis
        Historic win for public servants
        California Highway Patrol officer saves pilot moments before explosion
        Combating false information on your agency’s social media
    • On the Job
      • No case too cold
        Summer is coming
        Securing the Texas border one K-9 team at a time
        Empowering through experience
        Philadelphia Amtrack officer’s quick actions saves conductor’s...
    • Labor
      • Insufficient police staffing continues throughout the U.S.
        The righteous battle
        Recruitment and retention
        Austin police chief aims to end officer shortage as recruitment...
        Dallas City Council approves increased hiring goal for police...
    • Tech
      • Telegram investigations
        Florida sheriff’s office deploys cutting-edge forensic tool to...
        A new chapter for Utah law enforcement
        Is AI the future of report writing?
        Interagency communication in the age of email, YouTube and Zoom
    • Training
      • Off duty, but never off guard
        Meeting training needs on a limited budget
        Be a thermostat, not a thermometer
        Duty knives: Practical or just “tacticool”
        Dry-fire practice doesn’t need to be boring
    • Policy
      • Michigan Supreme Court: Marijuana odor alone no longer justifies...
        Milwaukee P.D. and schools clash over SROs
        Seattle Police Department launches new plan to curb violent crime
        Buffer-zone law blocked in Louisiana
        Dakota’s Law: Pensions for police dogs?
    • Health/Wellness
      • Texas sheriff’s office hit with series of suicides
        The tyranny of memories
        “Why are you mad at me?”
        Tired of being tired?
        Keeping your relationship resilient
    • Community
      • Battle of the Badges baseball game to support injured Missouri officer
        Temple University Police celebrate 7-year-old’s support with...
        A local problem with a statewide solution
        From traffic stops to tip-offs: Iowa officer becomes basketball...
        A state in crisis
    • Offbeat
      • Not eggzactly a perfect heist
        Pizza … with a side of alligator?
        Wisconsin man charged with impersonating Border Patrol agent twice in...
        Only in California?
        Durango, Colorado, police hop into action after unusual 9-1-1 call
    • We Remember
      • Honoring Fallen Heroes
        What’s with the white chairs?
        The pain and sorrow of loss
        A cop and his car
        A dream of remembrance
    • HOT Mail
      • The War on Cops Continues Unabated
  • On the Job
    • No case too cold
      Summer is coming
      Securing the Texas border one K-9 team at a time
      Empowering through experience
      Philadelphia Amtrack officer’s quick actions saves conductor’s...
  • Labor
    • Insufficient police staffing continues throughout the U.S.
      The righteous battle
      Recruitment and retention
      Austin police chief aims to end officer shortage as recruitment...
      Dallas City Council approves increased hiring goal for police...
  • Tech
    • Telegram investigations
      Florida sheriff’s office deploys cutting-edge forensic tool to...
      A new chapter for Utah law enforcement
      Is AI the future of report writing?
      Interagency communication in the age of email, YouTube and Zoom
  • Training
    • Off duty, but never off guard
      Meeting training needs on a limited budget
      Be a thermostat, not a thermometer
      Duty knives: Practical or just “tacticool”
      Dry-fire practice doesn’t need to be boring
  • Policy
    • Michigan Supreme Court: Marijuana odor alone no longer justifies...
      Milwaukee P.D. and schools clash over SROs
      Seattle Police Department launches new plan to curb violent crime
      Buffer-zone law blocked in Louisiana
      Dakota’s Law: Pensions for police dogs?
  • Health/Wellness
    • Texas sheriff’s office hit with series of suicides
      The tyranny of memories
      “Why are you mad at me?”
      Tired of being tired?
      Keeping your relationship resilient
  • Community
    • Battle of the Badges baseball game to support injured Missouri officer
      Temple University Police celebrate 7-year-old’s support with...
      A local problem with a statewide solution
      From traffic stops to tip-offs: Iowa officer becomes basketball...
      A state in crisis
  • Offbeat
    • Not eggzactly a perfect heist
      Pizza … with a side of alligator?
      Wisconsin man charged with impersonating Border Patrol agent twice in...
      Only in California?
      Durango, Colorado, police hop into action after unusual 9-1-1 call
  • We Remember
    • Honoring Fallen Heroes
      What’s with the white chairs?
      The pain and sorrow of loss
      A cop and his car
      A dream of remembrance
  • HOT Mail
    • The War on Cops Continues Unabated
  • About
  • The Magazine
  • Events
  • Partners
  • Products
  • Contact
  • Jobs and Careers
  • Advertise
  • Subscribe
Search

Policy

Enforcing and defending the law

Is a law or order legal and lawful?

Steve Foldy Published January 3, 2022 @ 2:13 pm PST

Dreamstime.com/Thomas Carter

Imagine your supervisor walked up to you as you stood outside a convenience store and said, “arrest that man,” while pointing to a man standing near a darkened fence line. Without commenting as to why they wanted you to make the arrest, would you make the arrest? Now, if your supervisor told you that the man was homeless, had not washed or cleaned themselves in several months, was so dirty that the stench emanating from that person’s body could be smelled several feet away and permeated any material he came in contact with so bad that the material had to be replaced as it could not be cleaned, and that complaints of his foul odor actually made several people feel ill, would you make the arrest? After all, the supervisor is talking about public safety since the person’s hygiene is affecting the health of others. If the answer is “yes” to either question, then you may need to re-evaluate how you do your job.

The questions posed boil down to one issue; is the order to arrest or take action legal and lawful? Remember, you can be held accountable and liable to being sued for false arrest and even lose your job depending on the circumstances. As police officers, we are sworn to “protect and serve,” as our motto says, but is there a limitation to what we can do and do we have a duty to act? Our oath as officers dictates that we defend and uphold the laws of the United States Constitution and the Constitution and laws of the state we live in, even though some politicians are quick to say it is unlawful for us to enforce federal laws. There have been several issues that illustrate the dilemma of taking action and/or enforcing policy, directives, rules, orders or “mandates” issued by a supervisor, elected official or government body.

The “red flag” and gun confiscation laws are primary examples. Some states added the provision that a judge has to issue a warrant or order before an officer can confiscate the guns a person owns, while other states made the laws less stringent. The problem with some of these laws is that anyonecan file a complaint against a person claiming that person is a danger. The inclusion of signing an affidavit with the threat of prosecution for committing perjury is also supposed to protect people’s rights from former spouses, girlfriends or angry neighbors. However, the veracity of the “evidence” presented in those affidavits is not investigated and considered prima facie evidence, meaning if they say it happened, then it happened, and the involved person ends up spending time, money and stress going through the legal process to prove their innocence. It was not until the Supreme Court ruled in Caniglia v. Strom (953 F. 3d 112 [2020]) that the red flag laws were struck down if a warrant was not issued. As Justice Thomas wrote for the unanimous court, “law enforcement can execute many civic tasks in modern society, but there is not an open-ended license to perform them anywhere.”

Every state has a statute that directs every law enforcement officer to do their job. Michigan’s law (752.11 Upholding or enforcing the law; duty of public officials. Sec. 1.) states, “Any public official, appointed or elected, who is responsible for enforcing or upholding any law of this state and who willfully and knowingly fails to uphold or enforce the law with the result that any person’s legal rights are denied, is guilty of a misdemeanor.” The onus of these laws is how do their supervisors interpret and define “willfully” and “knowingly” to find fault with the officer and the officer’s belief they have no choice but to follow the orders of their superiors or face some type of administrative or punitive action.

The saga of Army Lieutenant William Calley and the My Lai massacre in Vietnam is a prime example of blindly following the order or request by those appointed over you when what they are asking or ordering you to enforce or do may not be legal or lawful. Though the superiors stated they gave no such order or that Calley misconstrued the orders given, Calley and others stated they were under orders and felt duty-bound to follow those orders. Basically, would you follow the orders of a superior if the order was contrary to your ethics, morals and values, or you believed it violated the law or a policy? Sometimes, an officer or LE cannot wait on the courts to decide and must instead be steadfast on a position based on common sense and their knowledge of the laws, rules, regulations and policies. I have had several instances where I refused the order of a sheriff or general because the order was contrary to my ethical compass, military regulation or the law, and I rode the tsunami to prove I was right.

The legal argument of whether law enforcement has a duty to act was first addressed in South v. Maryland (59 U.S. 396 [1855]) and established the public duty doctrine. In Warren v. District of Columbia (444 A.2d 1 [1981]), Judge Hanson wrote for the D.C. Court of Appeals and based their decision on “the fundamental principle that a government and its agents are under no general duty to provide public services, such as police protection, to any particular individual citizen.” This doctrine was then supported in DeShaney v. Winnebago County DSS (489 U.S. 189 [1989]) when SCOTUS stated, “a state’s failure to protect an individual against private violence generally does not constitute a violation of the Due Process Clause, because the clause imposes no duty on the state to provide members of the general public with adequate protective services.” SCOTUS then reiterated law enforcement does not have a duty to act in Castle Rock v. Gonzales (545 U.S. 748 [2005]) when a restraining order was not enforced by LE. The Public Duty Doctrine was succinctly explained in McGaughey v. District of Columbia (No. 11-7001 [D.C. Cir. 2012]), when the U.S. Court of Appeals stated, “The public duty doctrine has long protected municipalities from negligence claims because it establishes that “[t]he duty to provide public services is owed to the public at large,” not to any specific individual.

The mandate of wearing a mask is a perfect example of conflicting interpretations of the power and authority a governing body has on the citizens. Some municipalities have queried the idea of having LE enforce the mandate issued by the federal government. Enforcing an action such as not wearing a mask is not codified in law, so LE does not have an actual law with a title and elements of proof to charge a person, so how can LE arrest, detain or take action against a person without violating their 4th Amendment right of unlawful seizure? SCOTUS upheld a federal court that suspended the mandate by the government that all employees had to wear a mask. To enforce the mandate anyway, the government then went to the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) to use that agency’s authority for workplace safety to enact and enforce the mandate.

Alexander Hamilton, James Madison and Thomas Jefferson authored the U.S. Constitution for consideration and approval of the delegates, and Thomas Jefferson penned it. In the Federalist papers Federalist 78, Alexander Hamilton wrote:

“There is no position which depends on clearer principles, than that every act of a delegated authority, contrary to the tenor of the commission under which it is exercised, is void. No legislative act, therefore, contrary to the Constitution, can be valid. To deny this, would be to affirm, that the deputy is greater than his principal; that the servant is above his master; that the representatives of the people are superior to the people themselves; that men acting by virtue of powers, may do not only what their powers do not authorize, but what they forbid.”

What Hamilton meant was the intent of the founding fathers was that Congress shall make no law that is contrary to the intent and meaning of the Constitution. Though the language is not specific in the Constitution, Jefferson ensured “we the people” had redress via the courts. American history is replete with examples of individuals and states using the courts to rescind, change or interpret laws, directives and mandates by the federal government.

Every LE agency, senior leader, union and police officer must know when a law or order is lawful and legal because failure to do so fails the people we are sworn to protect and our oath of office. If LE and its agents enforce the laws, orders, directives or mandates by superiors and government officials without applying common sense and critical thinking skills to justify following through, then LE and its agents could be violating the rights of the people by agreeing to be used as the baton to ensure everything is adhered to. By going along with or blindly following the orders, directives, mandates or laws of those appointed above us, LE becomes an agent of oppression, suppression and tyranny simply because we’re doing what we are told.

Steve Foldy

Steve Foldy

Steve Foldy (B.S., M.S.) is a retired U.S. Army military policeman and chief of police with over 30 years of police experience, including building and training an SRT team, FTO, traffic management and investigations, criminal investigations, building and activating a police department, writing and accrediting advanced-level LE courses, being a master fitness trainer and more. He is currently a trainer and consultant to law enforcement agencies in New Mexico. Steve welcomes your calls at (575) 635-8186 or email at stevefoldy@yahoo.com.

View articles by Steve Foldy

Categories: Policy Tags: Enforcing and Defending the law, mandate, Lawful, legal, Red Flag

Primary Sidebar

Recent Articles

  • A look into National Police Week
  • Honoring Fallen Heroes
  • What’s with the white chairs?
  • The pain and sorrow of loss
  • A cop and his car
  • No case too cold
  • Texas sheriff’s office hit with series of suicides
  • Summer is coming
  • Off duty, but never off guard
  • The tyranny of memories

Footer

Our Mission
To serve as a trusted voice of the nation’s law enforcement community, providing informative, entertaining and inspiring content on interesting and engaging topics affecting peace officers today.

Contact us: info@apbweb.com | (800) 234-0056.

  • Facebook
  • Instagram
  • Twitter

Categories

  • Editor’s Picks
  • On the Job
  • Labor
  • Tech
  • Training
  • Policy
  • Health/Wellness
  • Community
  • Offbeat
  • We Remember
  • Jobs and Careers
  • Events

Editor’s Picks

Getting ahead of the story

Getting ahead of the story

February 17, 2025

A state in crisis

A state in crisis

February 15, 2025

Historic win for public servants

Historic win for public servants

February 13, 2025

California Highway Patrol officer saves pilot moments...

California Highway Patrol officer saves pilot moments...

February 03, 2025

Policies | Consent Preferences | Copyright © 2025 APB Media, LLC | Website design, development and maintenance by 911MEDIA

Open

Subscribe

Close

Receive the latest news and updates from American Police Beat directly to your inbox!

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.